找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy; Ivan Cerovac Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[复制链接]
查看: 19186|回复: 41
发表于 2025-3-21 16:35:55 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy
编辑Ivan Cerovac
视频video
概述Builds an innovative structure than can be used to bring order to numerous accounts of epistemic democracy.Critically engages with the main theories of epistemic democracy.Discusses the implementation
丛书名称Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy
图书封面Titlebook: Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy;  Ivan Cerovac Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice
描述.This compelling new book explores whether the ability of democratic procedures to produce correct outcomes increases the legitimacy of such political decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy, it additionally evaluates arguments for different democratic decision-making procedures related to aggregative and deliberative democracy...Addressing both positions that are too epistemic, such as Epistrocracy and Scholocracy, as well as those that are not epistemic enough, such as Pure Epistemic Proceduralism and Pragmatist Deliberative Democracy, Cerovac builds an innovative structure that can be used to bring order to numerous accounts of epistemic democracy. Introducing an appropriate account of epistemic democracy, Cerovac proceeds to analyse whether such epistemic value is better achieved through aggregative or deliberative procedures. .Drawing particularly on the work of David Estlund, and including a discussion on the implementation of the epistemic ideal to real world politics, this is a fascinating read for all those interested in democratic decision-making.  .
出版日期Book 2020
关键词Epistemic justification; Democratic legitimacy; Experts; Truth; Decision-making; John Rawls; Political nih
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44602-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-44604-8
isbn_ebook978-3-030-44602-4Series ISSN 2946-2738 Series E-ISSN 2946-2746
issn_series 2946-2738
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy网络公开度




书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy被引频次




书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy年度引用




书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy读者反馈




书目名称Epistemic Democracy and Political Legitimacy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:03:20 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91174-3. This position endorses the truth tenet but, building upon epistemology of peer disagreement, claims that democratic procedures have some intrinsic epistemic qualities. I present arguments against the introduction of the concept of epistemic peerhood in the debate on political legitimacy and end th
发表于 2025-3-22 00:34:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:29:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:59:42 | 显示全部楼层
The Knowledge Tenet,. This position endorses the truth tenet but, building upon epistemology of peer disagreement, claims that democratic procedures have some intrinsic epistemic qualities. I present arguments against the introduction of the concept of epistemic peerhood in the debate on political legitimacy and end th
发表于 2025-3-22 15:40:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:39:07 | 显示全部楼层
Epistemic Democracy,legitimacy, such as Estlund’s standard account of epistemic democracy, which I endorse and defend in this book. The chapter proceeds by analyzing how various forms of democratic decision-making meet the criteria set by Estlund and concludes that aggregative democracy should be rejected in favor of deliberative democracy.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:24:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:12:18 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2020 decisions. Mapping and critically engaging with the main theories of epistemic democracy, it additionally evaluates arguments for different democratic decision-making procedures related to aggregative and deliberative democracy...Addressing both positions that are too epistemic, such as Epistrocrac
发表于 2025-3-23 07:36:27 | 显示全部楼层
System der Fett- und Wachsanalyse,stocracy, I demonstrate that scholocracy can be rejected as well, since it is not unreasonable to think that some epistemically damaging features (biases) might be present in the group that is given greater political authority. I end the chapter by claiming that the authority tenet should be rejected.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 03:02
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表