找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Energy, Risk and Governance; The Case of Nuclear Catherine Mei Ling Wong Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 En

[复制链接]
查看: 36007|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 19:05:16 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance
副标题The Case of Nuclear
编辑Catherine Mei Ling Wong
视频video
概述Provides a nuanced picture of why nuclear power in India can be considered a rational choice in spite of the risks.Exposes the ambiguities in both expert and public risk perceptions of nuclear energy.
图书封面Titlebook: Energy, Risk and Governance; The Case of Nuclear  Catherine Mei Ling Wong Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 En
描述.This book is about how energy, risk and governance are intertwined in the development of the nuclear industry in India and its relationship with the Indian public. It provides a rare insider-view of how the nuclear establishment thinks about risk, contrasted with public understandings of nuclear risk..Energy, Risk and Governance. presents a nuanced picture of why nuclear energy is still considered by some as a rational choice. This is in spite of its risks, the ambiguities in both expert and public risk perceptions, and the internal reflexivities that have emerged within the nuclear establishment as a result of the Fukushima-Daiichi disaster that is absent from public discourse. The insights in this book are not unique to India and similar observations can likely be made across the global nuclear industry..Reflecting on what this means for risk governance in practice, this book proposes practical suggestions and some tools that practitioners in the nuclear industry can use in public engagement, risk communication and deliberation at various stages of decision-making..
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Environmental Sociology; civilian nuclear power; energy security; developing world; risk governance; ener
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63363-3
isbn_softcover978-3-319-87534-7
isbn_ebook978-3-319-63363-3
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance网络公开度




书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance被引频次




书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance被引频次学科排名




书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance年度引用




书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance年度引用学科排名




书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance读者反馈




书目名称Energy, Risk and Governance读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:08:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:30:35 | 显示全部楼层
Prevention-Oriented Risk Formulationustry. It unpacks the clash of intellectual frames and patriotisms between the public and the nuclear establishment, but also highlights more moderate public views that might help depolarise the nuclear debate.
发表于 2025-3-22 06:41:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:13:48 | 显示全部楼层
,The Making of India’s Nuclear Energy Programme,-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Through this, the chapter constructs a more nuanced understanding of the national sentiments, shared memories, and ideologies that made nuclear energy a risky but rational technological choice for India in the minds of the elites.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:23:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:49:35 | 显示全部楼层
Public Risk Perceptions,ustry. It unpacks the clash of intellectual frames and patriotisms between the public and the nuclear establishment, but also highlights more moderate public views that might help depolarise the nuclear debate.
发表于 2025-3-22 23:30:04 | 显示全部楼层
From Risk Management to Risk Governance, the nuclear establishment can better mobilise public participation. A hybrid risk governance framework is introduced as a schematic for organising more deliberative decision-making with relevant public stakeholders.
发表于 2025-3-23 05:24:58 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2018Indian public. It provides a rare insider-view of how the nuclear establishment thinks about risk, contrasted with public understandings of nuclear risk..Energy, Risk and Governance. presents a nuanced picture of why nuclear energy is still considered by some as a rational choice. This is in spite o
发表于 2025-3-23 08:19:45 | 显示全部楼层
Preventing Suicide in Hospital-Based Careportant case study to understand, particularly in the post-Fukushima era, and the lessons it can offer to the global nuclear industry, especially developing countries considering nuclear energy. The chapter also offers insights to qualitative research methods from a female perspective, and explains the process of data analysis.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 22:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表