找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1; Leslie P. Willcocks,Chris Sauer,Mary C. Lacity Book 2016 Assocation for Inform

[复制链接]
查看: 18537|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 16:27:41 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1
编辑Leslie P. Willcocks,Chris Sauer,Mary C. Lacity
视频video
概述Presents the most interesting and compelling articles pertaining to the enactment of research methods used to study information systems from the 30-year publication history of the Journal of Informati
图书封面Titlebook: Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1;  Leslie P. Willcocks,Chris Sauer,Mary C. Lacity Book 2016 Assocation for Inform
描述.Thisedited three volume edition brings together significant papers previouslypublished in the .Journal of information Technology. (JIT) over its 30 yearpublication history. The three volumes of .EnactingResearch Methods in Information Systems. celebrate the methodologicalpluralism used to advance our understanding of information technology‘s role inthe world today. In addition to quantitative methods from the positivisttradition, JIT also values methodological articles from critical research perspectives,interpretive traditions, historical perspectives, grounded theory, and actionresearch and design science approaches. ..Volume1 covers Critical Research, Grounded Theory, and Historical Approaches. Volume2 deals with Interpretive Approaches and also explores Action Research. Volume3 focuses on Design Science Approaches and discusses Alternative Approaches includingSemiotics Research, Complexity Theory and Gender in IS Research...The.Journal ofInformation Technology. (JIT) was started in 1986 by Professors FrankLand and Igor Aleksander with the aim of bringing technology and managementtogether and bridging the ‘great divide’ between the two disciplines. TheJournal was created with t
出版日期Book 2016
关键词quantitative; critical research; grounded theory; methodological pluralism; positivist
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29266-3
isbn_softcover978-3-319-80525-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-29266-3
copyrightAssocation for Information Technology Trust 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1网络公开度




书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1被引频次




书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1被引频次学科排名




书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1年度引用




书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1年度引用学科排名




书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1读者反馈




书目名称Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:45:25 | 显示全部楼层
Introductionthen became to make a judicious selection that fulfilled these aims. Leaving many papers out was never going to be an easy process, but once we focused on the task, we were pleased to discover that we were more or less unanimous on which papers we needed, and how they should be classified.
发表于 2025-3-22 01:24:34 | 显示全部楼层
On Emergence and Forcing in Information Systems Grounded Theory Studies: The Case of Strauss and Cornd Cowley, 2004; Matavire and Brown, 2011). Bryant and Charmaz (2007) argue strongly that GTM can be seen as a ‘family of methods’, and we would concur with that view. Mills . (2006) write that GTM ‘can be seen as a methodological spiral that begins with Glaser and Strauss’ original text and continu
发表于 2025-3-22 07:53:55 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11123-8then became to make a judicious selection that fulfilled these aims. Leaving many papers out was never going to be an easy process, but once we focused on the task, we were pleased to discover that we were more or less unanimous on which papers we needed, and how they should be classified.
发表于 2025-3-22 09:39:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:00:58 | 显示全部楼层
started in 1986 by Professors FrankLand and Igor Aleksander with the aim of bringing technology and managementtogether and bridging the ‘great divide’ between the two disciplines. TheJournal was created with t978-3-319-80525-2978-3-319-29266-3
发表于 2025-3-22 21:08:28 | 显示全部楼层
Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1
发表于 2025-3-22 22:30:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:30:37 | 显示全部楼层
Introductions to put together from 20 years of contributions to the . a single volume on research methods and practices. However, as we read our way through the JIT issues starting with the most recent, we were quite startled to discover a very rich vein indeed on this theme going back as far as 1990. It became
发表于 2025-3-23 06:10:59 | 显示全部楼层
Information Technology as Disciplinary Technology: Being Critical in Interpretive Research on Informvalid knowledge (Henwood and Pidgeon, 1993). It is the methodology adopted by a researcher that is the dominant influence on the research process and findings, rather than the methods employed, which remain data collection techniques (Putnam, 1983, Llewellyn, 1993). By discussing methodology, we rev
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-9 17:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表