用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Embodying Democracy; Electoral System Des Sarah Birch,Frances Millard,Kieran Williams Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

[复制链接]
查看: 31698|回复: 43
发表于 2025-3-21 18:58:15 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Embodying Democracy
副标题Electoral System Des
编辑Sarah Birch,Frances Millard,Kieran Williams
视频video
丛书名称One Europe or Several?
图书封面Titlebook: Embodying Democracy; Electoral System Des Sarah Birch,Frances Millard,Kieran Williams Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan
描述Embodying Democracy analyzes the politics of electoral reform in eight post-communist states including Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, Russia and Ukraine. By exploring the multiple factors that shaped the design of electoral institutions during the first ten years of post-communist transition, it accounts for an important element of the post-communist reform process and illuminates general features of institutional design in post-transition states.
出版日期Book 2002
关键词communism; democracy; Electoral; Electoral reform; Electoral System; politics; proportional representation
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781403914248
isbn_softcover978-1-349-43211-0
isbn_ebook978-1-4039-1424-8Series ISSN 2947-6682 Series E-ISSN 2947-6690
issn_series 2947-6682
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Embodying Democracy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Embodying Democracy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Embodying Democracy网络公开度




书目名称Embodying Democracy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Embodying Democracy被引频次




书目名称Embodying Democracy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Embodying Democracy年度引用




书目名称Embodying Democracy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Embodying Democracy读者反馈




书目名称Embodying Democracy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:31:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:00:13 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-99000-7ven to the factors that shape them in the early stages of their development or the ways in which they evolve. A number of democratic countries made changes to their electoral laws in the 1990s, belying the view that ‘fundamental changes are rare and arise only in extraordinary situations’.. Yet the
发表于 2025-3-22 08:38:04 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20936-9litical system. Unusually, the law changed for three out of four elections (1991, 1993, 2001). Nor can the revisions introduced for the 2001 elections be viewed as final. Indeed, as Olechowski’s view above shows, even basic premises of electoral system design remained contested. Here we provide an o
发表于 2025-3-22 10:27:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:46:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:52:18 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50740-31990. The main principles of the provisional electoral law adopted prior to the first post-authoritarian election were maintained in legislation adopted by the first democratically elected parliament in 1991–2, and few changes were introduced thereafter (see Table 5.1). Romania has a bicameral parli
发表于 2025-3-23 00:45:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:28:59 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2253-8pose the system of his choice in 1993, did he choose a mixed system, and why, given the circumstances under which this system was imposed, was it not subsequently changed by parliament? This chapter will argue that a combination of high levels of uncertainty and multiple aims account for the adoptio
发表于 2025-3-23 07:12:12 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52707-8nevertheless considerable legislative activity in the electoral sphere. Like Poland and Russia, Ukraine adopted new electoral laws for each election after 1989, and each law was preceded by lengthy debates reflecting many basic issues of post-communist change. Principal among them was the proper rel
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-17 10:14
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表