找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Efficiency, Institutions, and Economic Policy; Proceedings of a Wor Rüdiger Pethig,Ulrich Schlieper Conference proceedings 1987 Springer-Ve

[复制链接]
楼主: Levelheaded
发表于 2025-3-26 22:48:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 03:24:20 | 显示全部楼层
Migrating to SharePoint Server 2016, our analysis was that the private monopoly supply of a public good is inefficient because, as in the case of a private good, the monopolist makes his supply artificially scarce. In this paper we study the question whether the inefficiency would disappear if there was a sufficient amount of competit
发表于 2025-3-27 05:48:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 10:53:27 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/302953.jpg
发表于 2025-3-27 15:06:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 18:11:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 22:38:53 | 显示全部楼层
Sayed Y. Hashimi,Sayed Ibrahim HashimiCharles Rowley and Wayne Brough offered a paper on a subject which is quite unknown on the continent, i.e. the Common Law and the American Court Rules. It is certainly unknown to me. Therefore I have to restrict my comments to some general remarks on the economic analysis in this paper.
发表于 2025-3-28 03:37:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 06:36:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 13:18:14 | 显示全部楼层
,Comment on C. Rowley and W. Brough: “The Efficiency of the Common Law: A New Institutional EconomicCharles Rowley and Wayne Brough offered a paper on a subject which is quite unknown on the continent, i.e. the Common Law and the American Court Rules. It is certainly unknown to me. Therefore I have to restrict my comments to some general remarks on the economic analysis in this paper.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-26 11:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表