找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Economics in Legal Reasoning; Péter Cserne,Fabrizio Esposito Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

[复制链接]
楼主: 可怖
发表于 2025-3-25 03:35:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 08:44:44 | 显示全部楼层
Neha Babbar,Harinder Singh Oberoing is concerned, these contributions fall into two large groups. Economics in legal reasoning concerns arguments about the purposes and consequences of legal rules and principles that are acceptable in court as legally relevant, including (1) predictions of the likely consequences of alternative leg
发表于 2025-3-25 15:36:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 18:51:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 23:18:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:46:56 | 显示全部楼层
Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry-vis the standards of relevance and reliability affirmed by the .. (1993). New data are provided on the number of antitrust economists whose expert testimonies have not survived a Daubert challenge. Explanations for such a poor record range from the judges’ insufficient economic literacy to skewed p
发表于 2025-3-26 05:01:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:30:48 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8526-2ning”. Social engineering conceives of the law as a means to social ends and of the economist as the technician studying to what extent laws are fit for purpose. Building on this idea, reverse engineering legal reasoning is a way to identify economic concepts that describe—are coherent with or fit—t
发表于 2025-3-26 14:41:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 20:45:15 | 显示全部楼层
Economics in Legal Reasoning978-3-030-40168-9Series ISSN 2662-6535 Series E-ISSN 2662-6543
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-10 09:56
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表