Titlebook: Ecology and Literature; Ecocentric Personifi Bryan L. Moore Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2008 America.Am

intensify

书目名称Ecology and Literature影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Ecology and Literature影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Ecology and Literature网络公开度




书目名称Ecology and Literature网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Ecology and Literature被引频次




书目名称Ecology and Literature被引频次学科排名




书目名称Ecology and Literature年度引用




书目名称Ecology and Literature年度引用学科排名




书目名称Ecology and Literature读者反馈




书目名称Ecology and Literature读者反馈学科排名

高尔夫

羊栏

recession

娘娘腔

Conclusion,d but important point in the intersection of the ancient art of rhetoric and the still-new field of ecocriticism. My account is complete enough to have thrown some light on an overlooked argument-by-trope in the history of ideas and in American literature especially. It is a trope that began, in ess

conservative

conservative

Anthropomorphic Subversion in American Literature,ever, Nature-in-itself” (71), she recognizes that the (anthropomorphic) “symbolic context” given to nature is the only option for those who wish to write about the natural world. Quoting Yeats’s “Sailing to Byzantium,” she notes that “even the golden bird is a ‘bodily form [taken from a] natural thing.’ No, it’s impossible to escape!” (73–74).

Provenance

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84291-6licitly for an eco-centric view of the world (among others, Thoreau, Leopold, Muir, Eiseley, Abbey, and Williams) but also in a great number of literary works from antiquity to the present, many of which are not typically considered ecocentric or often discussed by ecocritics.

共同给与

Conclusion,licitly for an eco-centric view of the world (among others, Thoreau, Leopold, Muir, Eiseley, Abbey, and Williams) but also in a great number of literary works from antiquity to the present, many of which are not typically considered ecocentric or often discussed by ecocritics.

纵欲

Atreyee Mondal,Nilanjan Dey,Amira S. Ashour views on nature and the means of language to apprehend it as first devised by Wordsworth, Coleridge, Emerson, Thoreau, and, of course, Charles Darwin. I am in this section predominantly concerned with the ecocentric personifications of a group of nature writers, but I do not suggest that all of their personifications are of this type.