设为首页收藏本站
开启辅助访问 切换到窄版

 找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步，快速开始

扫一扫，访问微社区

  • ALL
  • Journals
  • Books

派博传思国际中心 »期刊书目

› BOOKS
› BOOKS with Alphabet E (Ea, Eb,Ec, Ed, Ee…... )

1234567下一页
返回列表

Titlebook: Early Utilitarians; Lives and Ideals Ken Binmore Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Spri

[复制链接]
查看: 35194|回复: 61
发表于 2025-3-21 18:35:57 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Early Utilitarians
副标题Lives and Ideals
编辑Ken Binmore
视频video
概述Explores the lives and ideals of early utilitarian pioneers.Explains how economists intend to measure happiness.Offers an evolutionary reinterpretation of the contributions of modern philosophers
图书封面Titlebook: Early Utilitarians; Lives and Ideals Ken Binmore Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Spri
描述.People who put the public good before their own self interest have been admired throughout history. But what is the public good? Sages and prophets who think they know better what is good for us than we know ourselves held sway on this subject for more than two thousand years. The world had to wait for the Enlightenment that burst upon the world in the eighteenth century for an account of the public good free from the prejudices of the privileged classes. .Utilitarianism is our name for this new way of thinking about morality. Francis Hutcheson encapsulated its aims by inventing its catchphrase “The greatest happiness for the greatest number’’ fifty years before Jeremy Bentham, to whom the slogan is usually attributed.  But what is happiness? Why did Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill prefer to speak of utility? How did economists develop this notion?  Does it really make sense to compare the utilities of different people? Bob may complain more than Alice in the dentist’s chair, but is he really suffering more? Why should I put the sum of everybody’s utility before my own utility? .This short book asks how such questions arose from the social and political realities of the times
出版日期Book 2021
关键词Utilitarian thinking; Jeremy Bentham; John Rawls; John Harsanyi; David Hume; Happiness research; John Stua
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74583-7
isbn_softcover978-3-030-74582-0
isbn_ebook978-3-030-74583-7
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Early Utilitarians影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Early Utilitarians影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Early Utilitarians网络公开度




书目名称Early Utilitarians网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Early Utilitarians被引频次




书目名称Early Utilitarians被引频次学科排名




书目名称Early Utilitarians年度引用




书目名称Early Utilitarians年度引用学科排名




书目名称Early Utilitarians读者反馈




书目名称Early Utilitarians读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
1.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics
2.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty
3.jpg
 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory
4.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance
5.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用户组没有投票权限
可扩大
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-21 20:16:59 | 显示全部楼层
Gerhard Bauer,Mathias Niebergallent Athens is perhaps the best exemplar of the ancient attitude. The lecture apparently caused consternation among the students for its claim that the Good is to be found among the abstract ideals of which Plato thought the world of our senses is a mere shadow, but it eventually became the philosophical basis of early Christian theology.
灾祸
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 01:32:59 | 显示全部楼层
流浪者
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 08:26:43 | 显示全部楼层
Root494
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 11:55:10 | 显示全部楼层
MERIT
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 16:50:23 | 显示全部楼层
Obstacle
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 18:03:13 | 显示全部楼层
Helvetius,against him, he wrote three humiliating retractions, after which he kept out of France for a while, first in England and then in Prussia, where he had an invitation from the philosophically minded Frederick the Great.
Obstacle
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 00:39:11 | 显示全部楼层
使厌恶
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 03:25:34 | 显示全部楼层
accrete
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 05:48:30 | 显示全部楼层
宴会
回复

举报

下一页 »
1234567下一页
返回列表
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-7 16:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表