找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Early Modern Medicine and Natural Philosophy; Peter Distelzweig,Benjamin Goldberg,Evan R. Raglan Book 2016 Springer Science+Business Media

[复制链接]
楼主: 评估
发表于 2025-3-23 09:45:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 15:56:46 | 显示全部楼层
Mechanism and Chemical Medicine in Seventeenth-Century England: Boyle’s Investigation of Ferments ana specific work on ferments and fermentation, yet, this subject played a central part in his medical agenda. He pointed out that the understanding of ferments and fermentation would throw new light on physiological phenomena, notably on digestion. He was not isolated in his quest for the knowledge o
发表于 2025-3-23 21:01:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 22:45:50 | 显示全部楼层
Early Modern Medical Eudaimonism saw medicine as entirely integral to the project of philosophy to the extent that (i) it was the key to health and longevity, and thus to the realization of the good life; and (ii) it was conceived as including rules of diet, hygiene, and bodily comportment, and to this extent was seen as nothing l
发表于 2025-3-24 03:14:19 | 显示全部楼层
? The Physician as Atheist and the Medicalization of the Soul all. At best, some ‘folk physiology’ was entertained, usually to laugh at it (the pineal gland, animal spirits). Conversely, historians of neuroscience or of artificial intelligence (Jeannerod M, The brain machine. The development of neurophysiological thought, trans. D. Urion, Harvard University P
发表于 2025-3-24 08:08:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 12:33:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 18:47:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 22:00:02 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60418-8rtes’ mechanistic theory of the heart and, more generally, of the corpuscularianism associated with (e.g.) Descartes, Gassendi, and Boyle. He even criticizes his one-time teacher Hieronymus Fabricius ab Aquapendente (who was no mechanical philosopher!) for being overly influenced by the “petty reaso
发表于 2025-3-25 00:34:59 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-2 11:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表