Titlebook: Early Modern Humanism and Postmodern Antihumanism in Dialogue; Jan Miernowski Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

态度暖昧

ual problems shared by early-modern and post-modern periods.This book employs perspectives from continental philosophy, intellectual history, and literary and cultural studies to breach the divide between early modernist and modernist thinkers. It turns to early modern humanism in order to challenge

Aura231

炸坏

Panacea

彻底检查

Building the Jamming Organization,cault’s writing on space and governmentality, the chapter shows how, in such writers as Rabelais, Machiavelli, More, and Montaigne, colonies function as laboratories for thinking about government, and about the relationship between the government of the self and the government of others.

我要威胁

21st Century Media and Female Mental Healthto show that, while for both . and postmodern antihumanists, personal freedom needs to be understood in terms of individual autonomy, for sixteenth-century humanists freedom can only be grounded in love of the other.

Preserve

Alexander F. Barbuto,Peter R. Chaiuman finality and converted the humanity of the Bomb into a political and ethical question of its inhumanity. Positing the necessity of contingency, Meillassoux reaches beyond finality and thus allows the question of the humanity of the Bomb to once again become metaphysical.

Duodenitis

Book 2016y modernist and modernist thinkers. It turns to early modern humanism in order to challenge late 20th-century thought and present-day posthumanism. This book  addresses contemporary concerns such as the moral responsibility of the artist, the place of religious beliefs in our secular societies, lega

发展

Is the Author Responsible? Artistic Agency in Humanist and Antihumanist Perspectives,t of intellectual history. He situates this “death” as a historically contingent notion within the French and Anglo-American traditions. He uses examples from early modern and twenty-first-century artistic production (the sixteenth-century writers Desiderius Erasmus and François Rabelais and the con

fructose

An Ethics for Antihumanism? Belief and Practice,he separation of Church and State to argue that one can surrender matters of outward conduct in public to the State without compromising one’s “inner” beliefs. Yet, this secular conception of belief, isolated from broader social commitments, can also lead to radical expressions of faith. It is worth