用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Dose Finding and Beyond in Biopharmaceutical Development; Jingjing Ye,Ding-Geng Chen,Joseph C. Cappelleri Book 2025 The Editor(s) (if appl

[复制链接]
楼主: EVOKE
发表于 2025-3-25 05:42:45 | 显示全部楼层
Dose Optimization of Oncology Drugs: A Clinical and Regulatory Perspectiveluding leukemia 2023, kidney cancer, and melanoma (Siegel, CA Cancer J Clin 73(1):17–48, 2023). The development of targeted therapies, in particular, has dramatically altered the therapeutic landscape and improved outcomes for patients. Despite the seismic changes that have occurred in the field, so
发表于 2025-3-25 10:15:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 14:22:44 | 显示全部楼层
Novel Oncology Dose-Finding Designs for the New Millenniume treatments, oncology trials need to start human research at a lower dose level and then move up and down through some dose levels in a process called dose finding that helps determine a safe dose level. The toxicity of these oncology drugs is always assumed to increase with dose. However, unlike i
发表于 2025-3-25 16:56:48 | 显示全部楼层
Practical Guidance on Oncology Dose Escalation Designshe dose limiting toxicity (DLT) data have been widely implemented in real clinical trials, including rule-based designs (e.g., i3+3), model-based designs (e.g., CRM and BLRM) and model-assisted designs (e.g., mTPI, mTPI-2, and BOIN). In this chapter, we have a brief review of popular novel designs,
发表于 2025-3-25 21:20:55 | 显示全部楼层
Monotonic Dose–Response and Curve-Free Designs for Phase I Dose-Finding Trialsed designs typically use parametric models to facilitate the exchange of information across dose levels, curve-free designs rely solely on the monotonic assumption to extrapolate data between doses. In the first part of this chapter, we present several curve-free designs for phase I trials that were
发表于 2025-3-26 02:36:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 06:04:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 12:25:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 16:03:22 | 显示全部楼层
Patient-Reported Tolerability in Oncology Drug DevelopmentThere is a growing understanding of and encouragement for the use of PROs to capture tolerability. Traditionally, tolerability has been defined as the absence of serious adverse events. More recent and patient-centric definitions of tolerability have been put forward, focusing on how patients feel a
发表于 2025-3-26 17:21:51 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-14 16:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表