找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Durkheim & Critique; Nicola Marcucci Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature

[复制链接]
查看: 6536|回复: 46
发表于 2025-3-21 18:19:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Durkheim & Critique
编辑Nicola Marcucci
视频video
概述Offers a timely addition to debates in Critical Theory and Durkheim studies.Proposes a way to rethink the relation between social sciences, philosophy and critique.Includes essays from some of the mos
图书封面Titlebook: Durkheim & Critique;  Nicola Marcucci Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
描述.This book investigates the relation between Durkheim’s sociology, Critical Theory, and the philosophy of social sciences. The book is organized in four sections: confronting Durkheim and other critical traditions; inquiring his social and critical ontology; interrogating the relation between social practices and justice; and discussing his relevance in contemporary politics and political theory. An international group of philosophers, sociologists, and critical theorists contribute to show Durkheim’s reflection as an important complement—or an alternative—to the Hegelian-Marxist and post-structuralist conceptions of social critique. In this way, the book intends to inaugurate a new reflection on social critique at the intersection between philosophy and sociological theory. .
出版日期Book 2021
关键词Professional Ethics and Civic Morals; Hegel; Arendt; Peter Winch; The Rules of the Method
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75158-6
isbn_softcover978-3-030-75160-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-75158-6
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Durkheim & Critique影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Durkheim & Critique影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Durkheim & Critique网络公开度




书目名称Durkheim & Critique网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Durkheim & Critique被引频次




书目名称Durkheim & Critique被引频次学科排名




书目名称Durkheim & Critique年度引用




书目名称Durkheim & Critique年度引用学科排名




书目名称Durkheim & Critique读者反馈




书目名称Durkheim & Critique读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:55:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:13:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:36:59 | 显示全部楼层
Building the Bridges to Securitydt and Durkheim fundamentally diverge. The singularity of American constitution-making, according to Arendt, is what made the historical transmissibility of this revolutionary experience possible. Durkheim, for his part, argues that the French revolutionary tradition needs to be intellectually revis
发表于 2025-3-22 11:43:44 | 显示全部楼层
Diane Barrett Ph.D., C.I.S.S.P.proposing a new theory of ideology: as every ideology is an act of totalization, grounded in the idealization of the categories allowing this totalization itself, it seems that solidarity, understood as a scientific (sociologically) established principle of totalization, lacks its own idealization.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:57:13 | 显示全部楼层
Mathieu Bagot,Pascale Launay,Frédéric Guidecempirical means to realize its political ambition: to transform modern society as a whole, thanks to those institutions that had to achieve modern solidarity by overthrowing capitalist exploitation through democratic participation.
发表于 2025-3-22 20:10:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:11:03 | 显示全部楼层
Nima TaheriNejad,David Pollreiszble to recognize the political ideal that we, as moderns, must want: that of a self-direction of society, that is, of an ever-increasing democratization of the state—a project that corresponds to Durkheim’s definition of socialism.
发表于 2025-3-23 03:35:56 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,luation of Durkheim’s epistemological, political, and critical ambitions which resituated his position in the history of modern philosophical and sociological thought was emerging. Following this intellectual conjuncture, the contributions contained in this book investigate Durkheim’s legacy in orde
发表于 2025-3-23 05:52:43 | 显示全部楼层
Hegel and Durkheim: Contours of an Elective Affinityill consider the question of whether we find in Hegel’s . a placeholder for what Durkheim refers to as a kind of cosmopolitan ethics, a standpoint beyond the role-obligations connected to membership in individual states (iii). In my conclusion I will raise the question of the relevance of Hegel’s an
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 13:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表