找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Doing the Best We Can; An Essay in Informal Fred Feldman Book 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1986 Immanuel Kant.Indi

[复制链接]
楼主: Reticent
发表于 2025-3-23 11:30:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 15:19:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 19:38:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 23:54:10 | 显示全部楼层
Biases Introduced by the Algorithm Itselfo some concepts of obligation that have not been discussed here. Among these are various society- and code-relative forms of obligation, such as legal obligation and etiquettical obligation. Such concepts as these are not doing-the-best-we-can concepts of obligation. They would require a rather different sort of analysis.
发表于 2025-3-24 03:45:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 08:18:05 | 显示全部楼层
A Theory of Moral Obligationch is the concept of value that is used in the formulation of the theory of moral obligation proposed here. Finally, in Section 3, I state the theory itself, and point out a few of its most fundamental logical features.
发表于 2025-3-24 14:44:20 | 显示全部楼层
Conflicts of Obligationo some concepts of obligation that have not been discussed here. Among these are various society- and code-relative forms of obligation, such as legal obligation and etiquettical obligation. Such concepts as these are not doing-the-best-we-can concepts of obligation. They would require a rather different sort of analysis.
发表于 2025-3-24 18:37:56 | 显示全部楼层
0921-8599 sm are formally incoherent. I was intrigued by his argument. It had long seemed to me that I had a firm grasp on act utilitarianism. Indeed, it had often seemed to me that it was the clearest and most attractive of normative theories. Yet here was a simple and relatively uncontrover­ sial argument t
发表于 2025-3-24 20:05:41 | 显示全部楼层
Stability, Reliability, and Securityhese objections, I hope to show that my approach is rationally defensible. The second reason for considering the objections seems to me to be more important. It is this: the presentation of the objections and replies will enable the reader to gain a deeper understanding of the nature and purpose of the theory.
发表于 2025-3-25 01:41:23 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 11:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表