Titlebook: Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East; Christopher Wise Book 2009 Christopher Wise 2009 Jacques Derrida.language.realism

Covenant

书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East网络公开度




书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East被引频次




书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East被引频次学科排名




书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East年度引用




书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East年度引用学科排名




书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East读者反馈




书目名称Derrida, Africa, and the Middle East读者反馈学科排名

emission

Deconstruction of the Veil,r shawl, questions that are timely in the post-9/11 world. In previously published texts, Derrida traces the history of deconstruction to the German reformer Martin Luther, who influenced philosophers such as Fredrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. While Derrida’s deconstruction of the Pauline epis

共同确定为确

Arab-Jew,ity as an adolescent. In 1942, at the age of twelve, Derrida was expelled from the Lycée de Ben Aknoun in El-Biar, Algeria because of his Jewish ancestry. Derrida describes himself at this time as “a little black and very Arab Jew who understood nothing about [the reasons why he was expelled]” (58).

DAMP

Deconstruction and Zionism,ad. Derrida argues that the “universal structure of the Messianic” must be distinguished from the historical experiences of revelation within these religious traditions. Derrida defines “Messianicity” as a fundamental aspect of the human experience: “As soon as you address the other,” he claims, “as

深渊

The Figure of Jerusalem,ation, and by closely examining Fredric Jameson’s suggestion that . advocates a figurative exegesis or an inherently didactic hermeneutics. In describing the “war for the appropriation of Jerusalem,” Derrida effectively subordinates deconstruction to serve the interests of a specific politics that a

CLOWN

CLOWN

The Secular Trace,be inherited through “the blood and nerves” (31). Yerushalmi carefully documents what he calls Freud’s “Lamarckianism”—in spite of Freud’s firm rejection of Carl Jung’s hypothesis of the “collective unconscious.” As provocative as this thesis may initially seem, especially in light of prevailing fem

死亡

The Double Gesture,irrational” or “anarchist” critique of the Kantian university by annihilating its philosophical grounds. But, Derrida unequivocally affirms what he calls “a new university Enlightenment [.]” (. 132), as well as “the imperative of professional rigor and competence” (150). It cannot therefore be sa

BLA

Realism without Realism,question cannot be fully appreciated without reference to Sigmund Freud’s controversial book, . (1918), which Derrida relies upon as a kind of ur-text offering a reasonably accurate description of humanity’s earliest forms of social relations. The problem of the democratic, Derrida will seek to demo

Anthrp