找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings; Risto Hilpinen Book 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1971 deonti

[复制链接]
楼主: 大口水罐
发表于 2025-3-23 12:14:12 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08940-6predicates, we shall in this paper use the uppercase letters ., C, …, ., …. The reader may think of them as standing for some (unspecified) properties and relations of human acts. It is important to realize, and to keep in mind, that these letters do not represent individual acts, but stand for cert
发表于 2025-3-23 17:26:21 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0069742isholm criticizes some systems of so-called deontic logic, among them the system proposed by me in 1951,. on the ground that they are unable to cope with this normative idea. He also makes some positive suggestions concerning the logical structure of the imperatives in question.
发表于 2025-3-23 22:06:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 01:14:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 03:29:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 08:26:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 12:27:52 | 显示全部楼层
An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics,] and [19]. The ‘paradoxes’ which arise in these logics seem to indicate that the axioms reflect only some special senses of the words ‘obligation’ and ‘permission’. I believe that the questions of what these special senses are can be clarified by exhibiting a simple picture of the formal structure of these logics.
发表于 2025-3-24 15:43:21 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 22:25:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 02:26:20 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-19 14:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表