Titlebook: Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings; Risto Hilpinen Book 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1971 deonti

大口水罐

书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings网络公开度




书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings被引频次




书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings被引频次学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings年度引用




书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings年度引用学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings读者反馈




书目名称Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings读者反馈学科排名

宽度

New Foundations for Ethical Theory,lly behave. There are also philosophers of a more convenient sort, who only wish to tell us something about ethical theories. The doctrines advocated by these three kinds of philosophers all belong to the wide domain of ethics, and they are easily confused. However, we shall try not to confuse them

圆锥

Foregery

admission

An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics,] and [19]. The ‘paradoxes’ which arise in these logics seem to indicate that the axioms reflect only some special senses of the words ‘obligation’ and ‘permission’. I believe that the questions of what these special senses are can be clarified by exhibiting a simple picture of the formal structure

ATOPY

ATOPY

Deontic Logic and the Theory of Conditions*,otions of necessity, possibility, and impossibility on the one hand and the deontic or normative ideas of obligation (‘ought to’), permission (‘may’), and prohibition (‘must not’) on the other hand. In a broad sense, both groups of concepts can be called .; the members of the first group are sometim

可耕种

Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/265685.jpg

CHYME

Richard A. Harshman,Elizabeth Hampsoncience of morality”, and Ernst Mally [30] was the first to use the term — in the form . — to refer to logical study of the normative use of language. In accordance with Bolzano and Quine’s definition of logical truth, deontic logic can be defined as the study of those sentences in which only logical

搏斗