找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Deontic Logic and Normative Systems; 12th International C Fabrizio Cariani,Davide Grossi,Xavier Parent Conference proceedings 2014 Springer

[复制链接]
楼主: 佯攻
发表于 2025-3-28 17:05:48 | 显示全部楼层
President Fujimori and the Capture of Guzmanyze deontic paradoxes, and we illustrate it on the single agent decision problem of the miners scenario. We also introduce extensions with reactive arrows and actions, which can be used to give a linguistic interpretation of multi-agent dialogues.
发表于 2025-3-28 21:43:30 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08615-6agents; deontic logic; epistemic logic; formal methods; fuzzy logic; logic; logical analysis; modal and tem
发表于 2025-3-29 02:45:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 03:11:55 | 显示全部楼层
Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/265679.jpg
发表于 2025-3-29 09:53:03 | 显示全部楼层
Deontic Diversity,erent meanings of the deontic terms in natural language. Some of the ingrained disagreements on postulates in deontic logic may be resolvable if we recognize that the different viewpoints correspond to different meanings of the normative terms of ordinary language.
发表于 2025-3-29 11:32:16 | 显示全部楼层
Detecting Deontic Conflicts in Dynamic Settings,ntic logic. Second we introduce a new semantics for the obligations capable of representing and reasoning about them in these dynamic settings, and lastly we use it to identify the necessary and sufficient conditions to identify conflicting obligations.
发表于 2025-3-29 17:09:58 | 显示全部楼层
For a Dynamic Semantics of Necessity Deontic Modals,ing can be derived from the prescriptive one. A dynamic, non truth-functional semantics for necessity deontic modals is developed, in which the ideality relations among possible worlds can be updated. Finally, it is proven that the semantics solves several of the classic deontic paradoxes.
发表于 2025-3-29 21:42:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 01:19:38 | 显示全部楼层
,Chisholm’s Paradox and Conditional Oughts,generic oughts. Using the practical interpretation of ‘ought’ as a guideline, we propose a linguistically motivated logical solution to each of these problems, and explain the relation of the solution to the problem of contrary-to-duty obligations.
发表于 2025-3-30 06:41:33 | 显示全部楼层
Conference proceedings 2014dality, imperatives, supererogatory, etc.; the deontic paradoxes; the modeling of normative concepts other than obligation and permission, e.g., values; the game-theoretical aspects of deontic reasoning; the emergence of norms; norms from a conversational and pragmatic point of view; and norms and argumentation.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-31 23:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表