Titlebook: Deontic Logic and Normative Systems; 12th International C Fabrizio Cariani,Davide Grossi,Xavier Parent Conference proceedings 2014 Springer

佯攻

书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems网络公开度




书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems被引频次




书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems被引频次学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems年度引用




书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems年度引用学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems读者反馈




书目名称Deontic Logic and Normative Systems读者反馈学科排名

FOLD

Open Reading without Free Choice,he notorious principle turning permission of disjunction into conjunction of permissions .(. ∨ .) → . ∧ .. We start by giving a first-order logic version of OR that defines permission of action types in terms of the legality of action tokens. We prove that implies FCP. Given that FCP has been heavil

伪证

外科医生

A Preference-Based Semantics for CTD Reasoning,n. The system proved to be appropriate for handling well-known contrary-to-duty paradoxes but no model-theoretic semantics was presented. In this paper we fill the gap and define a suitable possible-world semantics for the system for which we can prove soundness and completeness. The semantics is a

羊齿

Detecting Deontic Conflicts in Dynamic Settings,rtant that these regulations do not conflict with each other and contain contradicting obligations. In the present paper we focus on identifying conflicts between obligations in dynamic settings. We first show the need of an alternative semantics rather than the more classic modelled by standard deo

歌剧等

歌剧等

Factoring Disjunction Out of Deontic Modal Puzzles,d wide discussion in recent work in natural language semantics. First, I contrast two opposed modal views—call them the “box-diamond” theory and EU theory—that form two poles of the contemporary debate. The opposition between them is underwritten by distinct, well-developed conceptions of what it is

障碍物

Toward a Linguistic Interpretation of Deontic Paradoxes,yze deontic paradoxes, and we illustrate it on the single agent decision problem of the miners scenario. We also introduce extensions with reactive arrows and actions, which can be used to give a linguistic interpretation of multi-agent dialogues.

得意牛

For a Dynamic Semantics of Necessity Deontic Modals,tics based on a primitive ideality order between possible worlds. Those approaches, however, do not take into account that, in natural language, obligation sentences primarily carry a prescriptive effect. The paper focuses precisely on that prescriptive character, and shows that the reportative read

Camouflage

Proof Analysis in Deontic Logics,ng admissible, and we give a syntactic proof of the admissibility of cut. This yields that the subformula property holds for them and that they are decidable. Then we show that our calculi are equivalent to the axiomatic ones, and therefore that they are sound and complete w.r.t. neighborhood semant