Titlebook: Deconstructing Derrida; Tasks for the New Hu Peter Pericles Trifonas,Michael A. Peters Book 2005 Peter Pericles Trifonas and Michael A. Pet

paltry

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08849-1ised by corporate and state influence in the conduct of academic inquiry, and by administrative infractions against the traditional aspiration of shared governance. Thorstein Veblen’s . (1918) and Robert Lynd’s . (1939) were prescient indictments of a not yet mature corporate university. Asking whet

CHART

牵索

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81348-0e question of the future of the Humanities (the Human Sciences). This question in its largest terms concerns the future of the book, of libraries, and of school as such. The point of departure of your research was Jacques Derrida’s ., which I translated into Korean. Perhaps we could begin with a rem

不规则

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81348-0inary borders without dissolving the specificity of each discipline into what is called, often in a very confused way, interdisciplinarity, or into what is lumped with another good-for-everything concept, ‘cultural studies.’ ”This is now a common gesture among serious deconstructive Europeanist Comp

Lasting

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6604-9ze the grounding of subjectivity and our knowledge about what it means to be human. This responsibility highlights the problem of exposing or creating locations for otherness within communitarian-based institutions such as the university, which still occupy the colonized space of traditional knowled

optic-nerve

filicide

Melanocytes

Book 2005 volume original essays by major scholars in the humanities today. Using Derrida‘s seven programmatic theses as a springboard, the contributors aim to reimagine, as Derrida did, the tasks for the new humanities in such areas as history of literature, history of democracy, history of profession, idea

一起平行

n a single volume original essays by major scholars in the humanities today. Using Derrida‘s seven programmatic theses as a springboard, the contributors aim to reimagine, as Derrida did, the tasks for the new humanities in such areas as history of literature, history of democracy, history of profes

CONE