找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Debating Laws; Studies on Parliamen A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[复制链接]
楼主: Enkephalin
发表于 2025-3-23 10:29:39 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46727-1Parliamentary debate; Legislative deliberation; Legisprudence; Justification of legislation; Constitutio
发表于 2025-3-23 15:29:36 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-031-46729-5The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
发表于 2025-3-23 19:11:06 | 显示全部楼层
A. Daniel Oliver-LalanaOutlines a methodology for analysing and evaluating legislative argumentation in parliament.Includes ten case studies offering a broad overview of the practice of legislative justification.Broadens le
发表于 2025-3-24 01:34:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 05:11:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 08:25:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 11:06:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 15:19:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 22:42:43 | 显示全部楼层
Johanna Duckstein,Michael Rittered to the approval of the .. This legislative scenario proves interesting, on the one hand, because the recognition of the rights of victims seems at first glance to be a non-controversial topic; on the other hand, because the Spanish legislature had to implement a European framework directive that
发表于 2025-3-25 00:18:38 | 显示全部楼层
Typografie und Layout im Bilderbuch Moroccan-Spanish borders in Ceuta and Melilla. The insufficiency of the reasons MPs adduced in defence of this measure, in my view, makes it very hard to say that these legislative debates were a reasonable source of justification in legisprudential terms: they provide, rather, a ‘non-justification
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-4-27 23:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表