找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Debating Laws; Studies on Parliamen A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice

[复制链接]
查看: 48761|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 17:45:27 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Debating Laws
副标题Studies on Parliamen
编辑A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana
视频video
概述Outlines a methodology for analysing and evaluating legislative argumentation in parliament.Includes ten case studies offering a broad overview of the practice of legislative justification.Broadens le
丛书名称Legisprudence Library
图书封面Titlebook: Debating Laws; Studies on Parliamen A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lice
描述.This book seeks to explore the potential and actual value of parliamentary debates as a source of legislative justification. Drawing on a sample of recent Spanish legislation, the papers collected here analyse (critically) the rationale of several laws or legislative measures as it can be reconstructed from the respective parliamentary discussions. All issues covered have given rise to intense political, legal and social controversy: they range from the combat against gender violence, the legal status of bullfighting, the protection of crime victims and the so-called ‘push-backs’ at the border, to the regulation of euthanasia, the minimum living income, underage girls’ access to abortion, and joint child custody. The volume is organised into two main parts. The first group of case studies adopt a legisprudential perspective and examine parliamentary deliberations in the light of the theory and methodology of legislative justification; the contributions in the second part followapproaches that fall outside – but are largely compatible with –legisprudence, and deal with aspects such as the rhetorical strategies employed by MPs when debating bills, and the role of elected legislators
出版日期Book 2024
关键词Parliamentary debate; Legislative deliberation; Legisprudence; Justification of legislation; Constitutio
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46727-1
isbn_softcover978-3-031-46729-5
isbn_ebook978-3-031-46727-1Series ISSN 2213-2813 Series E-ISSN 2213-2856
issn_series 2213-2813
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Debating Laws影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Debating Laws影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Debating Laws网络公开度




书目名称Debating Laws网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Debating Laws被引频次




书目名称Debating Laws被引频次学科排名




书目名称Debating Laws年度引用




书目名称Debating Laws年度引用学科排名




书目名称Debating Laws读者反馈




书目名称Debating Laws读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:23:31 | 显示全部楼层
,Was It Really ‘To No Avail’? The Legislative Deliberations on Underage Girls’ Access to Abortion ink on the ground by reviewing the legislative deliberations on underage girls’ access to abortion held in the Spanish Parliament in 2015—which resulted in the passage of the .. The outcome of this tentative review is ambivalent. On the one hand, in terms of extent (scope and depth) and structure, the
发表于 2025-3-22 01:10:05 | 显示全部楼层
Legislative Debates on Death with Dignity and Euthanasia. An Approach to the Spanish Situation, is to analyse the arguments used in the legislative debates. The present chapter undertakes such an analysis from a twofold perspective: firstly, by examining the rationality of those arguments, and secondly, by examining what models of debate shaped the parliamentary discussion of the bill. Knowin
发表于 2025-3-22 04:55:29 | 显示全部楼层
Debating on the Rights of Crime Victims: A Legisprudential Examination of the Parliamentary Delibered to the approval of the .. This legislative scenario proves interesting, on the one hand, because the recognition of the rights of victims seems at first glance to be a non-controversial topic; on the other hand, because the Spanish legislature had to implement a European framework directive that
发表于 2025-3-22 11:28:13 | 显示全部楼层
Expelling, Discussing, and Throwing Values Out, Moroccan-Spanish borders in Ceuta and Melilla. The insufficiency of the reasons MPs adduced in defence of this measure, in my view, makes it very hard to say that these legislative debates were a reasonable source of justification in legisprudential terms: they provide, rather, a ‘non-justification
发表于 2025-3-22 14:08:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:04:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:01:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:47:37 | 显示全部楼层
,Minimum Vital Income: A Legislative Debate from the ‘Participant-Observer’ Perspective,liamentary deliberation took place regarding the initially approved Royal Decree-Law and the bill negotiated in the Committee. This chapter uses the concept of rhetoric, as employed by Albert O. Hirschman, to review the distinct theses, recurring narratives, cliches, and metaphors utilized during th
发表于 2025-3-23 08:17:08 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-4-27 23:38
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表