用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs; Gregor Betz Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Argumentation

[复制链接]
楼主: 尤指植物
发表于 2025-3-26 22:37:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 03:52:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 06:28:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 12:48:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 17:17:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 19:41:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 00:25:06 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction to Part Iild on each other and follow a consistent line of reasoning. Based on this general orientation, we pinpoint, in Sect.3.2, the different pieces of evidence which back the main results concerning consensus-conduciveness (cf. Sect.1.4) and which are spread all over Part I. Hence, Sect.3.2 shall serve a
发表于 2025-3-28 04:20:33 | 显示全部楼层
The Consensual Dynamics of Simple Random Debatesuments are constructed randomly, and proponents adopt the coherent position which is closest to their previous one. These simulations will serve to scrutinize a simple hypothesis, which says that the overall consensus reached in a debate at some step . depends on two factors: (1) the initial agreeme
发表于 2025-3-28 07:01:07 | 显示全部楼层
The Consensual Dynamics of Random Debates with Explicit Background Knowledgeents are introduced randomly and as long as there are no commonly agreed upon background beliefs. In the following, we take background knowledge into account by explicitly fixing the truth values assigned to some of the sentences, and investigate whether this fosters the rapprochement of proponent p
发表于 2025-3-28 13:25:37 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-13 05:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表