找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs; Gregor Betz Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Argumentation

[复制链接]
查看: 39726|回复: 60
发表于 2025-3-21 17:39:27 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs
编辑Gregor Betz
视频video
概述Uses a highly innovative and original research method: multi-agent simulation of controversial debate.Addresses both the practical and theoretical implications of truth- and consensus-conduciveness of
丛书名称Synthese Library
图书封面Titlebook: Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs;  Gregor Betz Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Argumentation
描述Is critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth and consensus-conduciveness of controversial debates. The book brings together research in formal epistemology and argumentation theory. Aside from its consequences for discursive practice, the work may have important implications for philosophy of science and the way we construe scientific rationality as well.
出版日期Book 2013
关键词Argumentation Debate; Consensus Debate; Controversy Debate; Simulation Debate; Truth Debate
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4599-5
isbn_softcover978-94-017-8426-9
isbn_ebook978-94-007-4599-5Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs网络公开度




书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs被引频次




书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs被引频次学科排名




书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs年度引用




书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs年度引用学科排名




书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs读者反馈




书目名称Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:29:49 | 显示全部楼层
Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/264028.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 02:12:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:26:34 | 显示全部楼层
978-94-017-8426-9Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
发表于 2025-3-22 11:02:54 | 显示全部楼层
General Introduction, probably even older. But what precisely does this alleged improvement we aim at when engaging in a controversy mean? In which sense does the game of giving and taking reasons, presumably, better our beliefs?
发表于 2025-3-22 14:24:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:27:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:03:53 | 显示全部楼层
Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs978-94-007-4599-5Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
发表于 2025-3-23 03:29:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:21:46 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66739-3ents are introduced randomly and as long as there are no commonly agreed upon background beliefs. In the following, we take background knowledge into account by explicitly fixing the truth values assigned to some of the sentences, and investigate whether this fosters the rapprochement of proponent positions.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-21 19:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表