Titlebook: China’s Two Identities; Territorial Empire a Theodor Tudoroiu Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

变更

书目名称China’s Two Identities影响因子(影响力)




书目名称China’s Two Identities影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称China’s Two Identities网络公开度




书目名称China’s Two Identities网络公开度学科排名




书目名称China’s Two Identities被引频次




书目名称China’s Two Identities被引频次学科排名




书目名称China’s Two Identities年度引用




书目名称China’s Two Identities年度引用学科排名




书目名称China’s Two Identities读者反馈




书目名称China’s Two Identities读者反馈学科排名

强化

Introduction,The chapter proceeds by briefly discussing the factors that have led to the unusual coexistence of these identities, their origin and evolution, and the virtuous circle–characterized by a specific division of labor–they form in the context of the construction by the leadership in Beijing of a new, C

良心

,A Constructivist Theoretical Framework,tual state, Susan Strange in her study of structural power, and Barry Buzan and Gerald Segal in their discussion of the postmodern state. They are used to define and analyze the concepts of 19.-century-style territorial empire and 21.-century-style postmodern global power. Finally, the chapter shows

Vasoconstrictor

热心

China as Socializee,multilateral institutions were adopted and a reciprocal socialization phase typically followed the apprenticeship one. This is a Chinese effort to change the norms of multilateral institutions in ways beneficial to Beijing’s interests. This process often brought significant results but was unable to

GENRE

China as Socializer, based on the use of a deterritorial Chinese identity. Both reinforce Beijing’s international order as a thick order that relies on massive and diverse globalizing flows of goods and people. As a result, China’s 21.-century-style postmodern global power identity has finally reached maturity. At pres

GENRE

BURSA

hurricane

松果