Titlebook: Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism; A "Common Sense" Ana Ian Bruff Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmi

小故障

书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism网络公开度




书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism被引频次




书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism年度引用




书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism读者反馈




书目名称Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism读者反馈学科排名

不给啤

MUTE

Pituitary-Gland

Introduction, because institutions tend, over time, to become dysfunctional owing to the effects of economic, social and political change. Overcoming such dysfunction in European varieties of capitalism requires agreement on how to proceed. Thus institutional dysfunction, and economic underperformance, perpetuat

连锁

The Netherlands and Wassenaar,, says little about the . conditions of consensus. Nevertheless, a neo-Gramscian approach is in accordance with the spirit of van Dyk’s contribution to the extent that it seeks to denaturalize the role of consensus in the trajectory of the Dutch variety of capitalism.

慢跑

Politics and Economics and Farmers,t of much discussion in the varieties of capitalism literature — not least because they are frequently put forward as best and worst practice cases — with the Wassenaar and Alliance for Jobs processes often forming the core of the analysis. The political radicalization in both countries in the post-2001 period is considered in Chapter 7.

慢跑

Vsd168

带来的感觉

,Conclusion: “Critical” IPE?, overlap between different versions of common sense — or cultures — shapes the possibility for synthesis between different perspectives in the form of a consensus. This was demonstrated through the utilization of the theoretical framework to analyse the empirical data presented in Chapters 5–7, and is summarized by Table 8.1.

一致性