找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science; Essays for Joseph Ag I. C. Jarvie,Nathaniel Laor Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media D

[复制链接]
查看: 46176|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 19:19:07 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science
副标题Essays for Joseph Ag
编辑I. C. Jarvie,Nathaniel Laor
视频video
丛书名称Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
图书封面Titlebook: Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science; Essays for Joseph Ag I. C. Jarvie,Nathaniel Laor Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media D
描述I suppose Joseph Agassi‘s best and dearest self-description, his cher­ ished wish, is to practice what his 1988 book promises: The Gentle Art of Philosophical Polemics. But for me, and for so many who know him, our Agassi is tough-minded, not tender, not so gentle. True to his beloved critical thinking, he is ever the falsificationist, testing himself of course as much as everyone else. How, he asks himself, can he engage others in their own self-critical exploration? Irritate? Question their logic, their facts, their presuppositions, their rationales? Subvert their reasoning, uncover their motives? Help them to lose their balance, but always help them, make them do it to, and for, themselves. Out of their own mouths, and minds, and imagination. A unique teacher, in classroom and out; not for everyone. Agassi is not quite a tight textual Talmudist disputant, not quite the competitor in the marketplace of ideas offered for persuasive sale, not quite the clever cross-examining lawyer advocate, not quite a philosopher-scientist, not a sceptic more than necessary, not quite embat­ tled in the bloody world but not ever above the battle either . . . but a good deal of all of these, and s
出版日期Book 1995
关键词Karl R; Popper; Philosophy of Science; Rational Choice; logic; metaphysics; reason; science
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0471-5
isbn_softcover978-94-010-4211-6
isbn_ebook978-94-011-0471-5Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942
issn_series 0068-0346
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science网络公开度




书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science被引频次




书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science被引频次学科排名




书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science年度引用




书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science年度引用学科排名




书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science读者反馈




书目名称Critical Rationalism, Metaphysics and Science读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:59:21 | 显示全部楼层
Epiphenomenalism and Human Freedom’s Worship’ (henceforth FMW). However, we perceive it rather differently. Agassi’s estimate of it is higher than mine. He concluded his . with a fanfare to it; among other things he said that FMW “is still the modern enlightened man’s manifesto”. This occurs in a chapter entitled ‘Assurance and Agno
发表于 2025-3-22 00:54:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:22:06 | 显示全部楼层
You Can’t have Science as Your Religion!rtainly not with each other. But what does one do instead, when someone is using a word wrongly or misleadingly (as one thinks)? Well, various things according to circumstance. One strategy is to point out what is being glossed over in the usage one does not agree with. This is the strategy I shall
发表于 2025-3-22 10:20:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:39:35 | 显示全部楼层
Peano, Logicism, and Formalismis no less important, and often impressive, contributions to other branches of mathematics.. Moreover, Peano is usually mentioned in works concerning the foundations of mathematics, and his work has been presented — incorrectly — as part and parcel of the Logicist tradition, fostered by Bertrand Rus
发表于 2025-3-22 18:30:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:00:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:41:55 | 显示全部楼层
Criticism, Reasoning, and Judgment in Sciencemal or mathematical argument. ‘No, no’ he would say ‘You are not thinking; you are just being logical”’ (Frisch, 1979, p. 95).. It would be arbitrary and uncharitable to interpret Bohr’s point as implying that being logical is not a form of thinking. Rather it seems obvious that he is distinguishing
发表于 2025-3-23 08:50:02 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-2 22:15
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表