找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care; Basil A. Stoll (Honorary Consulting Physician) Textbook 1988Latest edition The Editor and the Contribu

[复制链接]
查看: 14504|回复: 51
发表于 2025-3-21 16:32:05 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care
编辑Basil A. Stoll (Honorary Consulting Physician)
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/239/238990/238990.mp4
图书封面Titlebook: Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care;  Basil A. Stoll (Honorary Consulting Physician) Textbook 1988Latest edition The Editor and the Contribu
描述An attempt to expose the dilemma between cost and benefit in the treatment of advanced cancer. It is written primarily for those physicians who ultimately have to make the choices in allocating resources, and discusses the reasons for differences in treatment between Europe and the USA.
出版日期Textbook 1988Latest edition
关键词amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); cancer; care; clinical trial; treatment
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09296-3
copyrightThe Editor and the Contributors 1988
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care网络公开度




书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care被引频次




书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care被引频次学科排名




书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care年度引用




书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care年度引用学科排名




书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care读者反馈




书目名称Cost Versus Benefit in Cancer Care读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:52:49 | 显示全部楼层
Hans-Dieter Klingemann,Max Kaasential variation in clinical management within national boundaries, probably more so than in the USA where a more informed, voluble and demanding society tends to reduce the scope for variation in clinical practice. Certainly, the medical profession in the United Kingdom enjoys greater autonomy than do USA clinicians [9].
发表于 2025-3-22 02:05:04 | 显示全部楼层
Wilhelm Bürklin,Russell J. Daltonuent in medical journals and in the lay press. Most hospitals have medical staff policies about ‘do not resuscitate’ orders, and many hospitals have established ethics committees to facilitate discussions and decision making.
发表于 2025-3-22 07:47:25 | 显示全部楼层
ch as in the USA [1], and such a finding makes one ask whether it results from different resource availability or from different treatment objectives in the two countries. In this respect the report quotes a British oncologist as saying that US doctors ‘confuse activity with progress’.
发表于 2025-3-22 11:13:52 | 显示全部楼层
What is Overtreatment in Cancer?n little can be achieved, and from the scientific need to develop new diagnostic or treatment methods. Yet, many physicians believe that treatment should be guided solely by clearly defined need in the patient and a high likelihood of benefit.
发表于 2025-3-22 15:39:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:41:21 | 显示全部楼层
Dying with Dignity: A United States Viewuent in medical journals and in the lay press. Most hospitals have medical staff policies about ‘do not resuscitate’ orders, and many hospitals have established ethics committees to facilitate discussions and decision making.
发表于 2025-3-22 21:32:10 | 显示全部楼层
Rationing Cancer Care: A European Viewch as in the USA [1], and such a finding makes one ask whether it results from different resource availability or from different treatment objectives in the two countries. In this respect the report quotes a British oncologist as saying that US doctors ‘confuse activity with progress’.
发表于 2025-3-23 03:52:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:56:32 | 显示全部楼层
ed branches of medicine, tempered with humanism. This necessarily implies a multidisciplinary approach. This chapter aims to survey the ways in which the differing contributions have been brought together in the UK and Europe, and to draw some conclusions about future trends in the care of dying cancer patients.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-11 02:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表