找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934; Carsten Jensen,Finn Aaserud,Helge Kragh,Roger H. S Book 2000 Springer Basel AG 20

[复制链接]
查看: 39666|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 16:41:22 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934
编辑Carsten Jensen,Finn Aaserud,Helge Kragh,Roger H. S
视频video
丛书名称Science Networks. Historical Studies
图书封面Titlebook: Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934;  Carsten Jensen,Finn Aaserud,Helge Kragh,Roger H. S Book 2000 Springer Basel AG 20
描述To all four of us, Carsten was the best possible friend and colleague. To Finn, he was a fellow student in the history of science for several years at the Niels Bohr Institute; to Relge, he was a welcome resource for personal and intellectual interac­ tion in an otherwise less than fertile environment for the history of science; Roger was Carsten‘s friend and advisor, not least in the development of the dissertation on which the present book is based; and as director of the Niels Bohr Archive, Erik was his main advisor in his historical work. Because he was the person closest to Carsten‘s work on his Ph. D. dissertation on the history of beta decay, on which the present book is based, it is only fitting that Erik stands as single author of the words in Carsten‘s memory at the very beginning of this book. Before his untimely death shortly after the completion of the Ph. D. disser­ tation, Carsten had himself plans to develop the dissertation into a book. Being a true perfectionist, he wanted to rework the manuscript substantively, especially with regard to relating it to the broader discussion among historians of science.
出版日期Book 2000
关键词atom; energy; history of science; particles; physics; radiation; spectra
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8444-0
isbn_softcover978-3-0348-9569-9
isbn_ebook978-3-0348-8444-0Series ISSN 1421-6329 Series E-ISSN 2296-6080
issn_series 1421-6329
copyrightSpringer Basel AG 2000
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934网络公开度




书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934被引频次




书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934被引频次学科排名




书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934年度引用




书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934年度引用学科排名




书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934读者反馈




书目名称Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:12:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 03:43:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:30:03 | 显示全部楼层
1421-6329 l years at the Niels Bohr Institute; to Relge, he was a welcome resource for personal and intellectual interac­ tion in an otherwise less than fertile environment for the history of science; Roger was Carsten‘s friend and advisor, not least in the development of the dissertation on which the present
发表于 2025-3-22 10:58:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:50:01 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-0348-9569-9Springer Basel AG 2000
发表于 2025-3-22 21:01:25 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1323-9inor interest. “I have often pointed out,” he wrote in 1906, “what an important part the α particle plays in radioactive transformation. In comparison the . and . rays play quite a secondary role.” . His attitude changed around 1911, however, and for some years Rutherford placed an essential part of
发表于 2025-3-23 00:50:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:35:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:28:23 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1748-0 disintegrations with artificially accelerated protons were made.. These events stimulated a dramatic increase in the number of publications and Ph.D. degrees awarded in nuclear physics, and the possibility for raising funds for nuclear research was much improved..
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-6 06:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表