找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics; Rethinking the Uncon Elena D‘Agostino Book 2015 The Author(s) 2015 Competitive market.Cons

[复制链接]
查看: 32448|回复: 38
发表于 2025-3-21 17:48:11 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics
副标题Rethinking the Uncon
编辑Elena D‘Agostino
视频video
概述Models contract complexity in the easiest possible way.Analyzes theory and practice in relation to standard form contracts.Explores how legal systems can be used to protect customers from fine prints
丛书名称SpringerBriefs in Law
图书封面Titlebook: Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics; Rethinking the Uncon Elena D‘Agostino Book 2015 The Author(s) 2015 Competitive market.Cons
描述.This book examines the most controversial issues concerning the use of pre-drafted clauses in fine print, which are usually included in consumer contracts and presented to consumers on a take-it-or-leave-it basis..By applying a multi-disciplinary approach that combines consumer’s psychology and seller’s drafting power in the logic of efficiency and good faith, the book provides a fresh and unconventional analysis of the existing literature, both theoretical and empirical. Moving from the unconscionability doctrine, it criticizes (and in some cases refutes) its main conclusions based on criteria which are usually invoked to sustain the need for public intervention to protect consumers, and specifically related to Law (contract complexity), Psychology (consumer lack of sophistication criterion) and Economics (market structure criterion)..It also analyzes the effects of different regulations, such as banning vexatious clauses or mandating disclosure clauses, showing that none of them protect consumers, but in fact prove to be harmful when consumers are more vulnerable, that is whenever sellers can exploit some degree of market power..In closing, the book combines these disparate aspe
出版日期Book 2015
关键词Competitive market; Consumer protection; Contract law; Contracts of adhesion; Fine print; Game theory; Mon
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13114-6
isbn_softcover978-3-319-13113-9
isbn_ebook978-3-319-13114-6Series ISSN 2192-855X Series E-ISSN 2192-8568
issn_series 2192-855X
copyrightThe Author(s) 2015
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics网络公开度




书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics被引频次




书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics被引频次学科排名




书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics年度引用




书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics年度引用学科排名




书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics读者反馈




书目名称Contracts of Adhesion Between Law and Economics读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:01:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:16:48 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13114-6Competitive market; Consumer protection; Contract law; Contracts of adhesion; Fine print; Game theory; Mon
发表于 2025-3-22 06:18:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:40:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:52:59 | 显示全部楼层
Vibrations of Elasto-Plastic BodiesWe will use game theory to prove formally that the main factors constituting the unconscionability doctrine (market structure, consumers‘ lack of sophistication and contract complexity) are not exhaustive in order to decide when and how laws or courts should intervene.
发表于 2025-3-22 17:37:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:39:51 | 显示全部楼层
Felix Klaedtke,Stefan Ratschan,Zhikun SheWe now relax the assumption of consumer sophistication and include (some) naive consumers in the analysis, defined as those consumers who do not care about clauses in fine print or simply do not realize the presence of these clauses, and therefore do not read.
发表于 2025-3-23 04:19:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:07:40 | 显示全部楼层
The Unconscionability Doctrine in a Law and Economics Perspective,We will use game theory to prove formally that the main factors constituting the unconscionability doctrine (market structure, consumers‘ lack of sophistication and contract complexity) are not exhaustive in order to decide when and how laws or courts should intervene.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-3 15:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表