Titlebook: Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy; Theories, Controvers B. Guy Peters,Philippe Zittoun Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

Cpr951

Behavioral Approaches: How Nudges Lead to More Intelligent Policy Design,ed to improve public policies. It argues that behavioral economics does not pose a threat to mainstream economics; moreover, policy-makers find it helpful in solving practical problems using randomized controlled trials. It also leads to greater innovation within public bureaucracies, better use of

MAG

排斥

debble

Conclusion: Public Policy Theory and Democracy: The Elephant in the Corner,iences, few public policy scholars today mention democracy (or its absence), and they certainly do not use it as a criterion for evaluating policy. In this chapter, we probe why and how policy scholars turned away from the topic, and examine the insignificant stature of the subject in contemporary a

侧面左右

Tools Approaches,ns that wield them. The chapter discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each variant and assesses how they cope with change in the policy-making environment by focusing on one particularly fast-moving and important change—the availability of digital tools and data for policy-making, and the widespread use of such tools by citizens.

污点

Bounded Rationality and Garbage Can Models of Policy-Making,s. Multiple streams add that greater ambiguity and contestation leads to more politicized, disjointed, and non-rational policy-making. Together they enhance the empirical validity of models of policy-making but also complicate them substantially.

extinguish

2524-7301 aches, behavioural models, and the use of instruments as an approach to public policy.  The volume concludes with a discussion of fundamental issues of democracy in public policy. 978-1-137-50494-4Series ISSN 2524-7301 Series E-ISSN 2524-731X

occurrence

委屈

抚慰

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04496-3ave different intellectual backgrounds and epistemological assumptions associated with different ideas about the dynamics of policy, so that the same set of data about policymaking may be perceived in quite different ways.