找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Conflicts in Curriculum Theory; Challenging Hegemoni João M. Paraskeva Book 2021Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author

[复制链接]
楼主: Conformist
发表于 2025-3-28 15:26:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 19:19:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 01:01:49 | 显示全部楼层
Mania Pavella,Damien Ernst,Daniel Ruiz-Vegals, it champions the notion of “epistemicide”—the killing of knowledge—in the field and argues for the need to challenge the dominant—i.e., Modern Western Eurocentric—epistemologies. The chapter also introduces a new theoretical approach—itinerant curriculum theory—an alternative way to think and to
发表于 2025-3-29 05:28:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 07:47:53 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4145-1efinition of education and the lethal consequences of a field under the yoke of learning and behavioral pedagogies. It also unpacks the limitations within particular counter-hegemonic approaches—i.e., political economy and autobiographical—dissects the epistemicidal nature of our field and its compl
发表于 2025-3-29 11:32:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 18:01:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 23:37:45 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4145-1ntially, the research lens for qualitative approaches. In this context, the chapter examines curriculum as scandal, a lethal ideological device produces an epistemicide—the killing of knowledge—epistemological havoc cooked up daily in the process of qualitative studies promoting and legitimizing a specific modern Western Eurocentric episteme.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-8 23:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表