找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Confiscation in Private International Law; Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam,Pieter Adriaanse Book 1956 Springer Science+Business Media Dord

[复制链接]
楼主: CK828
发表于 2025-3-23 10:37:55 | 显示全部楼层
Extra-Territorial Confiscations,eater unanimity. Thus the validity of extra-territorial confiscations is with few exceptions. rejected by the case law. This is not to be wondered at. When a government aims at extending such a drastic violation of the principle of protection of private property beyond its frontiers, the foreign . w
发表于 2025-3-23 15:42:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 20:36:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 23:41:14 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8915-6Germany; international law; private international law
发表于 2025-3-24 04:51:41 | 显示全部楼层
978-94-011-8240-9Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1956
发表于 2025-3-24 09:25:29 | 显示全部楼层
Daniel Ankarloo Ph.D.,Torbjörn Friberg Ph.D.e political and philosophic background of the . and despite the fact that it was preceded by extensive expropriations without compensation in the course of the French revolution., it can hardly be denied that the idea thus formulated and subsequently adopted in the French Constitution of 1791, in th
发表于 2025-3-24 13:16:04 | 显示全部楼层
Geoffrey Sherington,Craig Campbellhe question of validity may appear in different ways. Most frequent is the following case. The confiscating state, or its assignee, exports the confiscated goods and an action for recovery is brought before a foreign court either against the confiscating state, where the latter still claims a title
发表于 2025-3-24 16:24:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 22:42:26 | 显示全部楼层
Victoria-María MacDonald,Mark Nillesntries contains concrete rules in this respect. It is even remarkable that in England and the United States where common law plays the major role, part of the questions connected with confiscation are covered by legislation., which is not the case in most other countries. Judges therefore have taken
发表于 2025-3-25 02:42:20 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230603462tandards. Some decisions proved to have confined themselves to the case at issue; in others, however, more general principles were laid down. Since legislation on this point is lacking in most countries we framed some rules which should be regarded as self-supporting rules of private international l
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 14:50
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表