Titlebook: Compromise, Peace and Public Justification; Political Morality B Fabian Wendt Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

Asphyxia

书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification网络公开度




书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification被引频次




书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification被引频次学科排名




书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification年度引用




书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification年度引用学科排名




书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification读者反馈




书目名称Compromise, Peace and Public Justification读者反馈学科排名

幸福愉悦感

Two Levels of Moral Evaluationossibility of making moral compromises for moral reasons. On the first level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be. On the second level, one evaluates what the best arrangement would be under circumstances of disagreement about what the best arrangement would be. In a moral compromise, o

Cumulus

Consentine consent is. Whether consent is genuine, he argues, does neither depend on whether one faces offers or threats, nor does it depend on whether these offers or threats are coercive or exploitative. Instead, it depends, first, on whether one has the cognitive and emotional capacity to give voluntary

系列

我还要背着他

The Value of Peacet people most of the time. He also debates John Gray’s value pluralist argument for giving peace pride of place. He argues that value pluralism cannot show that peace has a special place among all values. What is special about peace is that it is in the interest of almost everyone.

善变

善变

外向者

Public Justification: The Basic Idealization of public justification has to deal with (at least) the following four issues: What is to be publicly justifiable? Who is the relevant constituency of public justification? How far should members of the constituency be idealized? Do justifying reasons have to be public reasons?

Medicaid

Rawls, Stability and Public Justificationhese answers can show that we should conceive public justification as a strictly necessary requirement for the moral justification of constitutional essentials (or laws more generally). But he also argues that one Rawlsian answer successfully shows that public justification should at least be concei

新鲜

Respect and Public Justificationt the requirement of respect for persons is not sufficient to ground a strict principle of public justification, but that it indeed is a source of the value of public justification. Public justification has constitutive moral value because it constitutes an expression of respect for persons.