找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Compromise, Peace and Public Justification; Political Morality B Fabian Wendt Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 201

[复制链接]
楼主: Asphyxia
发表于 2025-3-28 15:47:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 22:31:48 | 显示全部楼层
The Immunotracing of Keratinocyte Subsetshe discusses the idea of a ‘just peace,’ he rejects the claim that peace is a mere precondition for justice and not a value of its own, and he rejects the idea that realizing justice is necessary for achieving sufficiently stable peace.
发表于 2025-3-29 01:59:37 | 显示全部楼层
The Fibrous Proteins of the Epidermisaffairs of freely associated groups. Wendt argues that this is not the conception of peace we should adopt if we want a conception of peace that is feasible without moral consensus, something that allows us to live together in the face of moral disagreement.
发表于 2025-3-29 05:51:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 10:07:45 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907hese answers can show that we should conceive public justification as a strictly necessary requirement for the moral justification of constitutional essentials (or laws more generally). But he also argues that one Rawlsian answer successfully shows that public justification should at least be concei
发表于 2025-3-29 12:23:42 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907t the requirement of respect for persons is not sufficient to ground a strict principle of public justification, but that it indeed is a source of the value of public justification. Public justification has constitutive moral value because it constitutes an expression of respect for persons.
发表于 2025-3-29 18:14:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 22:31:22 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437907 moral evaluation. They thus provide moral reasons to make compromises. He also discusses what kind of moral reasons these are, he says a few words on other second-level values, and he discusses one of Simon May’s arguments against principled reasons to compromise in politics.
发表于 2025-3-30 00:16:39 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78884-0 consent, and, second, on whether the other party to the compromise violated basic moral rights in order to get one’s consent, or threatened to violate basic moral rights. When consent is not genuine, there is no genuine compromise as well.
发表于 2025-3-30 04:37:16 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-25 02:21
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表