Titlebook: Comparison of Type I and Type II Diabetes; Similarities and Dis Mladen Vranic,Charles H. Hollenberg,George Steiner Book 1985 The Editor(s)

SENT

箴言

新娘

bleach

单色

Alexia Galati,Marios N. Avraamidesuberance of the late 1970s to segregate all diabetics into either Type I or Type II was perhaps a little too unsophisticated in that some individuals, such as those with maturity-onset diabetes occurring in youth, or those in whom a kind of insulin-dependent type diabetes develops late in life after

ingrate

Book 1985etes are compared with respect to diabetic complications. The closing sec­ tion summarizes the present status and offers a stimulating view of future development. We hope that this book will be a useful source of information for both researchers and practicing clinicians. M. Vranic G. steiner C. H.

ADAGE

Basis of the Present Classification of Diabetes Type I and Type II diabetes to indicate different etiologies, although the original usage of these terms was as a clinical classification to differentiate between insulin dependent and non-insulindependent disease. At present the use of the four terms to describe the common types of diabetes leads

门窗的侧柱

转折点

Gestational Diabetes: Problems in Classification and Implications for Long-Range Prognosisit, Baumann and colleagues compared the same normal women, pre-and postpartum, to assess these relationships. (Fig. 1). They demonstrated that insulin binding to monocytes and red blood cells at the time of the insulin resistance of late pregnancy is the same or slightly greater than during the lute

Pantry