Titlebook: Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia; Productivist Models Mason M. S. Kim Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

搭话

书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia网络公开度




书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia被引频次




书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia被引频次学科排名




书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia年度引用




书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia年度引用学科排名




书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia读者反馈




书目名称Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia读者反馈学科排名

Presbycusis

What Drives the Institutional Divergence of Productivist Welfare Capitalism?,ity of the concept and its operationalization (Hudson and Kühner 2009), we cannot overlook the fact that it offers a compelling theoretical framework to understand the key nature of social policy development in East Asia.

货物

Conclusion,The authoritarian regime established in Taiwan after the 1949 Chinese Civil War was very much in the same position as Korea. During the 1950s and well into the 1960s, the Cold War played a central role in the development of the political institutions and economic structure. The authoritarian Kuomint

Intersect

bypass

ostensible

ostensible

Travelling and Driving Around: Road Novels,elfare states have evolved into a number of subtypes with systematic variations, what are the driving forces behind these variations? In short, how can we understand the presumed continuity and change of today’s East Asian welfare regime?

HUMID

Introduction,elfare states have evolved into a number of subtypes with systematic variations, what are the driving forces behind these variations? In short, how can we understand the presumed continuity and change of today’s East Asian welfare regime?

Corporeal

https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0080017development (Woo-Cumings 1999). Within this developmental paradigm, a strong commitment to . social welfare is regarded as inefficient and wasteful. This is why East Asian developmental states have espoused certain forms of institutional arrangements of productivist welfare capitalism (PWC) since the early stage of industrialization.

Minatory

Three Cases of Productivist Welfare Capitalism,development (Woo-Cumings 1999). Within this developmental paradigm, a strong commitment to . social welfare is regarded as inefficient and wasteful. This is why East Asian developmental states have espoused certain forms of institutional arrangements of productivist welfare capitalism (PWC) since the early stage of industrialization.