找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971; Ellen R. Feingold Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

[复制链接]
查看: 31861|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 18:19:26 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971
编辑Ellen R. Feingold
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/230/229671/229671.mp4
概述Provides the first account of the development and decolonization of a British colonial high court in Africa, as well as the first account of the development and decline of the Colonial Legal Service.T
丛书名称Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies
图书封面Titlebook: Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971;  Ellen R. Feingold Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an
描述.This book is the first study of the development and decolonization of a British colonial high court in Africa. It traces the history of the High Court of Tanzania from its establishment in 1920 to the end of its institutional process of decolonization in 1971. This process involved disentangling the High Court from colonial state structures and imperial systems that were built on racial inequality while simultaneously increasing the independence of the judiciary and application of British judicial principles.  Feingold weaves together the rich history of the Court with a discussion of its judges – both as members of the British Colonial Legal Service and as individuals – to explore the impacts and intersections of imperial policies, national politics, and individual initiative. .Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania. is a powerful reminder of the crucial roles played by common law courts in the operation and legitimization of both colonial and post-colonial states. .
出版日期Book 2018
关键词British Empire; Tanganyika; law; judges; High Court; national independence; justice; race; foreign policy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69691-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-88823-1
isbn_ebook978-3-319-69691-1Series ISSN 2635-1633 Series E-ISSN 2635-1641
issn_series 2635-1633
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971网络公开度




书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971被引频次




书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971被引频次学科排名




书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971年度引用




书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971年度引用学科排名




书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971读者反馈




书目名称Colonial Justice and Decolonization in the High Court of Tanzania, 1920-1971读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:25:22 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion,g colonial rule and then amid the growth of executive authority in the late 1960s and 1970s. It also asserts that this book’s approach to assessing the decolonisation of the High Court of Tanzania—especially its emphasis on the High Court’s place in the structure of the court system and judicial per
发表于 2025-3-22 01:23:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:28:27 | 显示全部楼层
The Marginalisation of the High Court Under Indirect Rule, 1920–1944nyika, colonial judges and professional magistrates were increasingly marginalised in the sphere of colonial justice by the administration. The Native Courts Ordinance of 1929 removed the Native Courts from the jurisdiction of the High Court and allowed the administration to prevent Africans from ac
发表于 2025-3-22 09:15:05 | 显示全部楼层
The Resurgence and Expansion of Tanganyika’s Judiciary, 1945–1958tion and stature of the colonial judiciary. The size and geographic reach of the professional judiciary expanded and the administration took the first steps towards integrating the dual court systems, giving colonial judges a role in deciding appeals from Native Courts. This chapter asserts that as
发表于 2025-3-22 14:02:43 | 显示全部楼层
Restructuring Colonial Justice, Empowering the High Court, 1959–1964tive than it had during colonial rule. Once the constitutional framework was in place, the government worked to unify the colonial court systems and replaced the lower courts with a new system of magistrates’ courts under the jurisdiction of the High Court. This chapter illustrates how the unificati
发表于 2025-3-22 20:09:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:33:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:11:13 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69691-1British Empire; Tanganyika; law; judges; High Court; national independence; justice; race; foreign policy
发表于 2025-3-23 07:13:48 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-13 09:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表