找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology; Karim Dharamsi,Giuseppina D‘Oro,Stephen Leach Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Au

[复制链接]
查看: 16052|回复: 46
发表于 2025-3-21 17:09:15 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology
编辑Karim Dharamsi,Giuseppina D‘Oro,Stephen Leach
视频video
概述Explores an under-served area: investigates Collingwood‘s main treatises in specific relation to the field of philosophical methodology.Offers currency: shows the relationship between Collingwood and
丛书名称Philosophers in Depth
图书封面Titlebook: Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology;  Karim Dharamsi,Giuseppina D‘Oro,Stephen Leach Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Au
描述This book discusses Collingwood‘s conception of the role and character of philosophical analysis. It explores questions, such as, is there anything distinctive about the activity of philosophizing? If so, what distinguishes philosophy from other forms of inquiry? What is the relation between philosophy and science and between philosophy and history? .For much of the twentieth century, philosophers philosophized with little self-awareness; Collingwood was exceptional in the attention he paid to the activity of philosophizing.  This book will be of interest both to those who are interested in Collingwood’s philosophy and, more generally, to all who are interested in the question ‘what is philosophy?’.
出版日期Book 2018
关键词Methodology; Philosophical analysis; Metaphilosophy; Metaphysics; Idealism
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02432-1
isbn_softcover978-3-030-40504-5
isbn_ebook978-3-030-02432-1Series ISSN 2947-552X Series E-ISSN 2947-5538
issn_series 2947-552X
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology网络公开度




书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology被引频次




书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology被引频次学科排名




书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology年度引用




书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology年度引用学科排名




书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology读者反馈




书目名称Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:25:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:48:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:03:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:27:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:16:45 | 显示全部楼层
Sich gesund fühlen im Jahre 2000away with, his earlier metaphilosophical reflections. The chapter provides a much-needed guide to understanding how Collingwood developed his mature metaphilosophical views concerning the nature of philosophy through his engagement with Oxford realism and logical positivism.
发表于 2025-3-22 20:47:47 | 显示全部楼层
,Die Privatheitsideologie und der Körper,o Collingwood, is to ‘excavate’ different complexes of questions and answers until the absolute presuppositions which govern them are reached. It is this historical methodology that gives Collingwood’s metaphysics its distinctive character.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:06:26 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80567-6lown deflationary strategy: rather than seeing philosophical problems as fake problems and advocating the end of philosophy, he sees the role of philosophical analysis to be that of making explicit the absolute presuppositions which inform different causal explanations in different contexts of inquiry.
发表于 2025-3-23 01:36:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:57:09 | 显示全部楼层
Erster Entwicklungszyklus (Papierversion)well’s diagnosis of the problem, but not with his proposed solution. For Collingwood, the solution lies not in liberalizing nature, but in rejecting a conception of metaphysics as a science of pure being and understanding it instead as a historical enquiry into the presuppositions of science, including natural science.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-25 22:18
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表