找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching; Randal Holme Book 2009 Randal Holme 2009 cognitive linguistics.language.language teaching.lin

[复制链接]
查看: 44664|回复: 42
发表于 2025-3-21 16:16:11 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching
编辑Randal Holme
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching;  Randal Holme Book 2009 Randal Holme 2009 cognitive linguistics.language.language teaching.lin
描述This book argues that Second language teaching has not been well served by recent approaches to the description of language content. The book explores how Cognitive Linguistics offers teachers a description of language that can translate into practical classroom activities.
出版日期Book 2009
关键词cognitive linguistics; language; language teaching; linguistics; second language; literary diction
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233676
isbn_softcover978-1-349-35918-9
isbn_ebook978-0-230-23367-6
copyrightRandal Holme 2009
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching网络公开度




书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching被引频次




书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching被引频次学科排名




书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching年度引用




书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching年度引用学科排名




书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching读者反馈




书目名称Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:26:18 | 显示全部楼层
The Problem of Linguistic Meaning acquired and try to match them to these forms. This learning assumption rests in how all speakers of the world’s languages look out on the same reality with the same mind and will thus break it down into roughly the same meanings.
发表于 2025-3-22 03:26:49 | 显示全部楼层
Conceptualisation, Embodiment and the Origins of Meaningt. Socrates wondered how an ignorant shepherd boy could manipulate objects as if he were aware of their geometric properties. The larger question was how we come to know anything when we do not already know it. The problem rests in the perception that there is a subjective ‘I’, or person, looking ou
发表于 2025-3-22 05:22:42 | 显示全部楼层
Gesturegesture. Those who doubt the significance of this might observe somebody on the phone. Gesture has therefore become an area of increasing research interest, and has come to be treated not just as central to the development and use of language but to its evolution also. For example, Ramachandran (200
发表于 2025-3-22 09:28:28 | 显示全部楼层
Language, Culture and Linguistic Relativityounter the problem of how the different experiences that people have can be gathered into common conceptualisations that build common meanings. The solution lies in how human (and to some extent, animal) societies develop cultures. A culture is finally the collectivisation of experience, allowing so
发表于 2025-3-22 15:19:34 | 显示全部楼层
Conceptualisation and Construalmar of language. Consider sentences (32) and (33):.At first sight, ‘adore’ and ‘love very much’ seem to make these sentences almost synonymous. However, each . the expressed emotion somewhat differently from the other. ‘Adoration’ abases the subject before their admired object. ‘Loving very much’ si
发表于 2025-3-22 20:15:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:23:29 | 显示全部楼层
Usage and Grammatical Meaning006), the radical construction grammar of Croft (2001) and the cognitive grammar of Langacker (1987). However, all these approaches share some core views of what grammar is, how it is acquired and how it is used to shape utterances that we can understand. These views can be summarised as follows:.In
发表于 2025-3-23 05:07:52 | 显示全部楼层
Towards a Cognitive Linguistics Syllabusuage teaching syllabus has been linguistic in the sense of treating a language as a topic whose meanings merit active exploration. I have advocated the exploration of language content, first to build what was once called the explicit knowledge that precedes proceduralisation, or automatised processi
发表于 2025-3-23 06:19:05 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-7-2 13:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表