Titlebook: Chinese Maritime Cases; Selection for Year o Martin Davies,Jiang Lin Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

bizarre

Daewoo Shipbuilding & Maritime Engineering Co., Ltd. v. Glory Advance Corporation,on clause providing that any disputes would be arbitrated in London. Because of the Defendant’s default in making mortgage payments, the Plaintiff successfully made a claim in arbitration in London. The arbitrators’ award in the Plaintiff’s favor was ratified by the court at (2014) Xia Hai Fa Ren Zi

crockery

,Export–Import Bank of China et al. v. Nanjing Wujiazui Ship Building Co., Ltd. et al.,n applied for a loan from the two Plaintiffs. Plaintiff bank filed suit after nondelivery of the vessel to Defendant purchaser. Defendant shipbuilder argued that Defendant purchaser did not have its permission to transfer its rights under the shipbuilding contract to Plaintiff banks, making the tran

现存

Martin Davies,Jiang LinOffers selected Chinese maritime judgments.Provides insights of how Chinese maritime courts apply Chinese maritime law in practice.Assists foreign parties to make wise decision on how to manage their

Antarctic

Chinese Maritime Cases Serieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/225857.jpg

一再遛

Philipp N. Baecker,Ulrich Hommel, Ltd. and others, for damage to three radiators and three drivepipes that were received damaged at the port of destination. The Plaintiff argued that improper stacking of the containers resulted in the damage to the goods, but the Defendants argued that improper internal packaging and a storm cause

Evocative

Thomas Dangl,Michael Kopel,Wolfgang Kürstender’s liability for container detention could not exceed the value of the containers; claim was not time-barred because one-year limitation period ran from moment when it became obvious that it was impossible for the consignee to take delivery of the goods because they had been auctioned by customs

喊叫

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12662-8der agreed to transport from Huangpu to Shanghai. The goods were damaged by water after the carrying ship was involved in a collision with another ship. The court held that the Plaintiff was entitled to recover damages from the Defendant. The Plaintiff’s claim was not time-barred because under Chine

Visual-Acuity

货物

condone