Titlebook: Chinese Maritime Cases; Selection for Year o Martin Davies,Jiang Lin Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

胆小懦夫

大炮

CONE

自爱

stroke

Allianz China General Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Youda (Shanghai) International Freight Co., Ltd. et al, Ltd. and others, for damage to three radiators and three drivepipes that were received damaged at the port of destination. The Plaintiff argued that improper stacking of the containers resulted in the damage to the goods, but the Defendants argued that improper internal packaging and a storm cause

bizarre

珊瑚

系列

China Shipping Logistics Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Zhongtai Bridge Steel Structure Co., Ltd.,r the Defendant delayed payment of freight and refused to return the bid bond that the Plaintiff had prepaid. The court found for the Plaintiff, awarding it damages for unpaid freight and for interest on the late payments of freight.

GRILL

ARY

COSCO Container Lines Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Finigate Integrated Logistics Co., Ltd. Qingdao Branch to contain solid waste, which is prohibited by the state from being imported. The goods were not taken for delivery. The Plaintiff asserted that the four Defendants were jointly and severally liable for the container detention fee of RMB561,015, together with interest and court fees, claiming the Fi