Titlebook: Child First; Developing a New You Stephen Case,Neal Hazel Textbook 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

Baleful

书目名称Child First影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Child First影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Child First网络公开度




书目名称Child First网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Child First被引频次




书目名称Child First被引频次学科排名




书目名称Child First年度引用




书目名称Child First年度引用学科排名




书目名称Child First读者反馈




书目名称Child First读者反馈学科排名

tariff

Textbook 2023policy and practice, alongside discussion of critical themes, makes it a key read for students on youth crime/justice modules and for a wider market..Stephen Case. is Professor of Youth Justice in the Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy division at Loughborough University, UK. .Neal Hazel. is P

avulsion

ents on youth crime/justice modules and for a wider market..Stephen Case. is Professor of Youth Justice in the Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy division at Loughborough University, UK. .Neal Hazel. is P978-3-031-19271-5978-3-031-19272-2

艰苦地移动

Challenging the Risk Paradigm: Children First, Positive Youth Justice explanations of ‘youth offending’ and youth justice responses in the Western world and the rise to prominence of neo-correctionalist risk management is the hegemonic model of youth justice, notably in England and Wales, animated by the Risk Factor Prevention Paradigm. The chapter continues by traci

轻率的你

ironic

ironic

Developing Child First Youth Justice Policy in England and Wales—A View from Inside the YJB and Wester. The author argues that these ideas fell short of creating a ‘child first’ policy but played a part in preparing the ground for the emergence of ‘child first’ youth justice in 2019. He asserts that it was the creation by the New Labour government of the Youth Justice Board in its specific constit

Fantasy

Thyroiditis

somnambulism

Embracing children’s Voices: Transforming Youth Justice Practice Through Co-production and Child Firt participation including potential resistance to change amongst the youth justice workforce, the perception that children pose a ‘threat’ to society, the credibility of children’s knowledge and capabilities, and the continuation of a ‘risk’ led deficit-based practice. The authors problematise the p