找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Central Problems in Social Theory; Action, structure an Anthony Giddens Textbook 1979Latest edition Anthony Giddens 1979 social science.soc

[复制链接]
查看: 52365|回复: 41
发表于 2025-3-21 16:19:07 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory
副标题Action, structure an
编辑Anthony Giddens
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Central Problems in Social Theory; Action, structure an Anthony Giddens Textbook 1979Latest edition Anthony Giddens 1979 social science.soc
出版日期Textbook 1979Latest edition
关键词social science; social theory; sociology; structure; theory
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4
copyrightAnthony Giddens 1979
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory网络公开度




书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory被引频次




书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory被引频次学科排名




书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory年度引用




书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory年度引用学科排名




书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory读者反馈




书目名称Central Problems in Social Theory读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:37:55 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82435-7accentuate the importance of the ‘system’, social and linguistic, as contrasted with the elements which compose it. But from then on the characteristic emphases diverge. In functionalism, the guiding model of ‘system’ is usually that of the organism, and functionalist authors have consistently looke
发表于 2025-3-22 03:49:09 | 显示全部楼层
J. Gardavský,V. Daněk,J. Máša,J. Plášek clearly distinguished from trends in non-Marxist social science, since most of the same divisions appear, even if in rather different form, within Marxism: the contrasts between the various sorts of ‘phenomenological Marxism’, ‘critical theory’, ‘Marxist structuralism’, etc. are often as pronounced
发表于 2025-3-22 05:38:40 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction, Whatever differences might exist between these, they share certain common deficiencies deriving from the context of their formation; no one today, I think, can remain true to the spirit of Marx by remaining true to the letter of Marx.
发表于 2025-3-22 10:52:44 | 显示全部楼层
Structuralism and the Theory of the Subject,accentuate the importance of the ‘system’, social and linguistic, as contrasted with the elements which compose it. But from then on the characteristic emphases diverge. In functionalism, the guiding model of ‘system’ is usually that of the organism, and functionalist authors have consistently looke
发表于 2025-3-22 14:08:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:08:02 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/223205.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 22:20:25 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82435-7ial sciences. Virtually all my work since that date has been concerned with developing that project. It seemed to me then, and still seems to me now, that social science in the contemporary world bears the strong imprint of ideas worked out in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in Europe.
发表于 2025-3-23 04:01:43 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82435-7Both terms have long since lost any precise meaning, but it is possible none the less to identify a number of core notions which each invokes. Functionalism and structuralism in some part share similar origins, and have important features in common. The lineage of both can be traced back to Durkheim
发表于 2025-3-23 08:23:50 | 显示全部楼层
J. Hogg,O. M. Nierstrasz,D. Tsichritzis analysis. The making of such a connection, I shall argue, demands the following: a theory of the human agent, or of the subject; an account of the conditions and consequences of action; and an interpretation of ‘structure’ as somehow embroiled in both those conditions and consequences..
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-29 15:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表