Titlebook: Carl Schmitt, Mao Zedong and the Politics of Transition; Qi Zheng Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2015 Maoism.Co

Itinerant

规范就好

哀悼

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137320964s understanding of the relationship of the individual and the state. The analysis will help us to construct the role of the individual at the founding and protecting moment of the politics of transition. The political activities in the founding and protecting moments of the politics of transition do

充满装饰

New Critical Essays on H.P. Lovecraftindividual and the state in the politics of transition. In Chapter 1, I mentioned that some Chinese scholars use the drawbacks of Mao’s political theory to deny justification for studying Schmitt’s theory in China. Although I briefly discussed the difference between Schmitt and Mao in Chapter 1, sti

Flagging

Chris Murray,Kevin Corstorphine the conclusion of Chapter 4). This chapter further presents the relationship of their theories from the perspective of the politics of transition. It will give a clear answer to the second research question set at the beginning of this book. A detailed anal ysis of Mao’s and Schmitt’s theoretical r

Foment

Chris Murray,Kevin Corstorphinejustification for studying Schmitt’s theory in China? What is the real theoretical relationship between Schmitt and Mao? After answering these questions, I explore the significance of the model that I developed from Schmitt’s theory for democratic transition in China.

孤独无助

http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/222126.jpg

结果

FLASK

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137466594Maoism; Communism; Political theory; Legal theory; China; Carl Schmitt; law; Mao Zedong; political philosoph

OATH