Titlebook: Capital in Higher Education; A Critique of the Po Krystian Szadkowski Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

observatory

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97664-4igher education sector into a capitalist production sector .. The reconstruction is then considered here as an attempt to approximate the specifics of the subsumption of labour under capital within the higher education sector.

Ornament

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8106-6not be achieved solely through the automatic collapse of capital under the weight of its own contradictions or by rupturing the form-value from within. Instead, it necessitates the active pursuit of autonomy for the common, building upon its present manifestations. The chapter concludes with a reflective summary of the book’s argument.

Mortar

Niedrigdosisstrahlung und Gesundheit in the book, allowing the focus of the argument to narrow down to essential elements necessary for understanding the relationship between academic labour and capital. Additionally, it elucidates the rationale behind choosing Marx as a guide who helps navigate these intricate relations. . aims to pr

针叶树

H.-Erich Wichmann,Lothar Kreienbrockher education research characterised by crass empiricism. It seeks to identify conditions that enable an approach free from the constraints of capitalist knowledge production. Marx’s conception of critique emerges as a viable solution, particularly when it upholds the integrity of three critical mom

Fibrin

Vergleichende Politikwissenschaftnalysing economic relations in higher education. It begins by discussing how the progressive marketisation processes in higher education have coincided with the expansion of neoclassical economics as the dominant framework within higher education research. The chapter then explores three distinct ap

collateral

Niedriglohnbeschäftigung im Wohlfahrtsstaatontrast to the existing Marxist literature that primarily focuses on capturing capital as a totality and emphasising its all-encompassing nature, this approach also emphasises both the moments within this totality and the historical conditions that allow them to emerge. A more nuanced analysis is ac

nepotism

埋葬

亚当心理阴影

,1900–1962: From Planck to Bohr,nceptualisation of prestige. While delving into the history of ideas is beyond the scope of this chapter, it focuses on the significant role played by Robert K. Merton and his Columbia group in this process. The chapter argues that Merton and his group, closely associated with the creators of the bi

污点

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4517-3alists’ claim that establishing capitalist relations in higher education is impossible due to knowledge’s peculiar character, which makes it difficult to privatise. Modern capitalist open access, a growing source of revenue in academic publishing, shows that capital can adapt to this sector’s unique