Titlebook: Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism; The Exegete as Theol N. Scott Amos Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Cam

implicate

书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism网络公开度




书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism被引频次




书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism年度引用




书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism读者反馈




书目名称Bucer, Ephesians and Biblical Humanism读者反馈学科排名

Fortuitous

Keratin

热情的我

1572-5596 show the extent to which he was a theologian of the biblical humanist school, influenced by the method Erasmus set forth in the .Ratio Verae Theologiae.in which true theology begins, ends, and is best “done” as an exercise in the exegesis of the Word of God..978-3-319-36244-1978-3-319-10238-2Series ISSN 1572-5596

Inflamed

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641y Tremellius after Bucer’s death (Bucer died before completing them) and published in 1562; additional, more limited evidence is found in the . and notes taken by a Trinity Student, John Banck, but as a representation of the whole of Bucer’s lectures, Tremellius’s edition is the fullest we have.

等级的上升

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403973641f a Rhenish “school” of exegesis and theology which shaped the theological curriculum in the .. Hence, what we find in the prefatory lectures in Cambridge was in keeping with his earlier career. One might characterize his statement as a “.”.

注射器

Conclusion: Masks and Uncertainty,ded theological formulation), he added a separate discussion that builds further on his exegesis. Yet his practice is consistent with his prefatory lecture, and is an example of biblical humanist method in theology and exegesis.

Deadpan

取之不竭

他一致

Das Idol Maske eines Verbrechens,e (the principal focus in this study) and in his prior career. It becomes clear that Bucer was a theologian in the model of biblical humanism: exegesis as the true theology, the exegete as the true theologian.