找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Bourdieu and Marx; Practices of Critiqu Gabriella Paolucci Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

[复制链接]
楼主: T-cell
发表于 2025-3-26 22:24:13 | 显示全部楼层
The Poverty of Philosophy: Marx Meets Bourdieuturns away from the dominated as a source of social change and back to intellectuals and the realpolitik of reason which calls on the state and law to realize their claims to universality. Similarly, the failure of working-class revolution leads Marx to return to the logic of theory—the theory of th
发表于 2025-3-27 03:59:50 | 显示全部楼层
Marx/Bourdieu: Convergences and Tensions, Between Critical Sociology and Philosophy of Emancipation” and Marx’s hesitations between economism and constructivism are compared. The third field concerns the theory of praxis between the sociology of action and revolutionary politics. The fourth field concerns the political philosophy of emancipation, important in Marx’s approach, present but more mar
发表于 2025-3-27 07:36:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 12:06:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 14:15:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 18:20:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 01:44:24 | 显示全部楼层
Bourdieu’s Lesson: Marx vs. Althusser?e first aim of this essay is to show that Bourdieu’s critique is in turn contradictory because he does exactly what he reproaches to Althusser, that is, he poses himself, in turn, as the unique and authentic interpreter of Marx’s text. The second purpose of the essay is to analyse Althusser’s respon
发表于 2025-3-28 02:35:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 08:27:40 | 显示全部楼层
Sumita B. Khatri,Emily J. Penningtonhilosopher that the sociologist scatters throughout his works, and by the adoption of a critical perspective that denotes a massive Marxian presence. In the concatenated set of critiques underpinning the architecture of his work, in the plethora of questions he raises, and in the scientific practice
发表于 2025-3-28 13:03:45 | 显示全部楼层
Inflammatory Pathways in Sarcoidosis,ury court aristocracy, transmitted to the urban bourgeoisie and then ultimately to the popular classes. Bourdieu, in his turn, addressed such an Eliasian “civilizing process” in various works, whilst emphasizing not just the State monopoly of violent power but also of symbolic power. Further, in his
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-28 12:08
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表