找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Bourdieu and Marx; Practices of Critiqu Gabriella Paolucci Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

[复制链接]
查看: 31092|回复: 56
发表于 2025-3-21 18:55:45 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Bourdieu and Marx
期刊简称Practices of Critiqu
影响因子2023Gabriella Paolucci
视频video
发行地址The first volume in English to explore the relationship between Bourdieu and Marx.Gathers essays concerning the strategic modes of appropriation that Bourdieu practiced with regard to Marx.Devoted to
学科分类Marx, Engels, and Marxisms
图书封面Titlebook: Bourdieu and Marx; Practices of Critiqu Gabriella Paolucci Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen
影响因子This new book gathers together essays concerning the strategic modes of appropriation that Bourdieu practiced with regard to Marx, together with their various outcomes. It is especially devoted to the practice of critique that both thinkers exercised vigilantly throughout their careers, as this is the terrain on which we can best illuminate the debt that Bourdieu acknowledged to Marx. Ongoing dialogue with the entire body of Marxian critique is a constant in Bourdieu‘s writings. This is most clearly evidenced by the adoption of a critical perspective on the social world that denotes a massive Marxian presence. It is reinforced by the repeated references to Marx’s texts that the sociologist scatters throughout his works. Indeed, in the interlinked set of critiques underpinning the architecture of his work, in the plethora of questions he raises, and in the scientific practice he adopts, Bourdieu attaches himself to the Marxian model — notwithstanding his polemical remarks andhis own deviations, or, we might even say, by virtue of them. The book is divided into three interconnected sections for ease of access: critique of domination, critique of economic practices and theories,  and 
Pindex Book 2022
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Bourdieu and Marx影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Bourdieu and Marx影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Bourdieu and Marx网络公开度




书目名称Bourdieu and Marx网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Bourdieu and Marx被引频次




书目名称Bourdieu and Marx被引频次学科排名




书目名称Bourdieu and Marx年度引用




书目名称Bourdieu and Marx年度引用学科排名




书目名称Bourdieu and Marx读者反馈




书目名称Bourdieu and Marx读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:12:36 | 显示全部楼层
Bourdieu with Marx, from Economy to Ecologyl capital” designates a second component of the dominant class: a “competence capital,” endowed with its own mode of structural reproduction. Beyond its social and political relevance, this analysis reveals the immense ecological impact in terms of productivism and consumerism of this “other front.”
发表于 2025-3-22 03:18:01 | 显示全部楼层
Violence, Symbolic Violence and the Decivilizing Process: Approaches from Marx, Elias and Bourdieution of violence..The distinctive French route to capitalism has continued to be a major issue in Marxist and historical sociological discussion, notably in the Brenner (Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe: The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism. In The Bren
发表于 2025-3-22 07:42:26 | 显示全部楼层
Putting Marx in the Dock: Practice of Logic and Logic of the Practiceurdieu’s theoretical and empirical work stands the analysis of the nature of domination and the mechanisms by which it reproduces social structures and makes them acceptable. The role played by the habitus and the body becomes increasingly central in Bourdieu’s theory of domination and is pivotal in
发表于 2025-3-22 10:43:14 | 显示全部楼层
The Poverty of Philosophy: Marx Meets Bourdieuhat Bourdieu calls scholastic reason. Marx and Bourdieu both identify the source of this fallacy in the failure of philosophers (and other intellectuals or academics) to recognize the peculiar conditions under which they produce their knowledge. Accordingly both Marx and Bourdieu turn from the logic
发表于 2025-3-22 16:03:08 | 显示全部楼层
Marx/Bourdieu: Convergences and Tensions, Between Critical Sociology and Philosophy of Emancipationatory hermeneutics of theoretical texts, which breaks with the presupposition of coherency of “works” and “authors” in the wake of Michel Foucault’s warnings in . (1969). By dissociating the concepts and methods from the “works” from which they are derived, our ambition is to create renewed “sparks
发表于 2025-3-22 17:18:43 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:00:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:34:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:10:40 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-28 11:15
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表