找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights; Roberto Bin,Sara Lorenzon,Nicola Lucchi Conference proceedings 2012 Springer Milan 2012 biotec

[复制链接]
楼主: 根深蒂固
发表于 2025-3-25 04:36:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 09:44:51 | 显示全部楼层
The Turbulence of Academic Collaborationfocused on the “common heritage argument” according to which genetic human heritage is a common good that cannot be subject to intellectual property rules. First of all the most important theories on genetic heritage as common good are illustrated, then the relationship between patents and access to
发表于 2025-3-25 13:49:09 | 显示全部楼层
Issues and Rights in DNA-based Inventionsl issues that result from the patenting of biotech inventions with a specific emphasis on the effects of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) patents and their potential to interfere with fundamental individual rights and civil liberties.
发表于 2025-3-25 16:17:37 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22030-3l issues that result from the patenting of biotech inventions with a specific emphasis on the effects of Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) patents and their potential to interfere with fundamental individual rights and civil liberties.
发表于 2025-3-25 21:12:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 03:39:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 07:28:11 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2032-0biotech innovations; biotech patents; fundamental rights; genetic research; genetica data
发表于 2025-3-26 11:49:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 14:06:12 | 显示全部楼层
Patentability Requirements of Biotech Inventions at the European Patent Office: Ethical IssuesThe main patentability criteria applied by the European Patent Office on inventions in the Biotech field are herein discussed, with particular reference to the ethical aspects related to this field of technology.
发表于 2025-3-26 18:06:19 | 显示全部楼层
Daryl John Powell,Erlend Alfnes,Eivind Rekeontroversy as a paradigmatic example, I reflect on the importance of fundamental rights as an institutional safeguard against the expansionary tendency of intellectual property law and on the role of the judiciary as guarantor of social cohesion, endangered by the disruptive effects of market rationality.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 10:15
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表