找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights; Roberto Bin,Sara Lorenzon,Nicola Lucchi Conference proceedings 2012 Springer Milan 2012 biotec

[复制链接]
查看: 10256|回复: 64
发表于 2025-3-21 17:32:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
期刊全称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights
影响因子2023Roberto Bin,Sara Lorenzon,Nicola Lucchi
视频video
发行地址A comparative discussion of the most controversial biolaw questions: biotech patents, freedom of research and protection of fundamental rights.An eye-opening look into the constant tension between gen
图书封面Titlebook: Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights;  Roberto Bin,Sara Lorenzon,Nicola Lucchi Conference proceedings 2012 Springer Milan 2012 biotec
影响因子.Biotechnology is a recognized research area that has increasingly advanced into new technologies and modern practices raising several legal, ethical and regulatory issues. The revolutionary speed of biotech innovations has had a significant impact on the protection of the rights of the individual. Fundamental rights provide a framework within which the justification of .limitations and restrictions. .to biotechnology innovations and research results have to be assessed. The legal regulation of scientific research and scientific investigations impact more and more directly on the freedom of research and therapies as well as on the broad diffusion of knowledge. Closely related is also the debated question of the technological manipulation of life and the boundary of scientific knowledge with regard to the topical question of genetic invention patents and their side effects on access to scientific information and health care opportunities..Drawing on expertise from different disciplines, the volume comprises invited papers and plenary presentations given at the conference entitled “Biotech Innovations & Fundamental Rights” that took place on Januray 20-21 2011 at the Department of Ju
Pindex Conference proceedings 2012
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights网络公开度




书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights被引频次




书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights被引频次学科排名




书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights年度引用




书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights年度引用学科排名




书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights读者反馈




书目名称Biotech Innovations and Fundamental Rights读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:44:44 | 显示全部楼层
David J. Rothman,Susan Delaney Spearping approaches in regenerative medicine. On the other hand, the ban of patenting invention based on embryonic stem cells appears to limit this approach, since scientists working in stem cell medicine will not be able to deliver clinical benefits without the involvement of biological industry, which
发表于 2025-3-22 00:56:09 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2681-4. 40/2004, in accordance with the Constitution. The ultimate consequence of these substantial restyling efforts by the Italian Courts is that the previously forbidding “face” of Law 40/2004 has basically changed to become broader and more reassuring.
发表于 2025-3-22 06:40:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:03:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:10:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:20:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:03:56 | 显示全部楼层
Daryl John Powell,Erlend Alfnes,Eivind Rekethe ‘old’ and ‘new’ enclosures. In this paper I suggest that the critical account of the rise of the ‘market economy’ provided by Polanyi can shed some light on other important issues in intellectual property law. In particular, I advance the hypothesis that the paradigm of the ‘double movement’ mig
发表于 2025-3-23 02:46:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:20:38 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19884-9ive. The Italian Parliament recently decided on the issues of “provenance” and “ownership” of biological material within the framework of the Intellectual Property Code. The provision is open to criticism for several reasons. The first problem is the issue of informed consent “to the use” of the bio
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 09:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表